VS

Renault Clio vs Toyota Aygo comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (17,100 £ vs 18,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or Toyota Aygo?

Renault Clio vs Toyota Aygo: Key differences

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space

Toyota Aygo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more efficient
  • a bit lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Clio

Introduction: Tailoring the Urban Experience

In the competitive world of compact cars, the Renault Clio and Toyota Aygo stand out as popular choices for city dwellers and small car enthusiasts. Both models offer unique features, technologies, and driving experiences tailored for urban environments. In this article, we will delve into a detailed comparison of these two appealing vehicles, examining their technical specifications, innovations, and overall performance.

Aygo

Design and Dimensions: Making a Statement

The Renault Clio showcases a modern hatchback design, measuring 4053 mm in length, 1798 mm in width, and 1440 mm in height. Its sporty appearance and five-door configuration make it practical and attractive for young drivers.

On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo features a compact SUV design, with dimensions of 3700 mm long, 1740 mm wide, and 1510 mm high. Although slightly smaller, the Aygo's distinctive styling and five-door entry ensure that it also leaves a mark in the crowded urban landscape.

Clio

Engine Options: Power and Efficiency

The engine line-up of the Renault Clio is versatile, featuring options like a 1.6L full hybrid and petrol variants ranging up to 143 HP. It also offers LPG engines, which is a bonus for those seeking alternative fuel options. The automatic transmissions, including a CVT option, provide smooth gear shifting, while the front-wheel drive system ensures efficient handling on city roads.

Conversely, the Toyota Aygo packs a 1.0L petrol engine generating 72 HP. Though less powerful compared to the Clio, it is still a reliable option for maneuvering through urban settings. It is available with both manual and CVT automatic transmissions. The consistency of fuel consumption—approximately 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km—along with a CO2 emission rating between 108 and 112 g/km, supports its reputation as an economical vehicle.

Aygo

Performance: Acceleration and Top Speed

Acceleration is one of the key differentiators between the two cars. The Renault Clio impressively accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 9.3 seconds, proving to be the faster option for those who crave performance. The Clio boasts a maximum speed of 174 km/h, which is notably higher than the Aygo's top speed of 158 km/h.

The Aygo lagged behind, with an acceleration time of 15.5 to 15.6 seconds. While not built for speed, its driving characteristics are perfect for navigating urban traffic, making it more about convenience than raw performance.

Clio

Interior and Comfort: Room for the Journey

When it comes to interior space, the Renault Clio takes the lead with its capacity to accommodate five passengers comfortably. The trunk space is also generous, offering a trunk capacity of 301 to 391 liters depending on the model. This additional space caters well to families and those who require room for luggage or groceries.

The Toyota Aygo, however, only seats four and has a smaller trunk capacity of 231 liters. Despite this, the Aygo's smaller size can be an advantage for urban maneuverability, making parking in tight spots easier.

Aygo

Innovations: Tech Features at the Forefront

Both the Renault Clio and Toyota Aygo come equipped with modern technology, but the Clio edges out slightly with advanced features. It includes a robust infotainment system with an intuitive touchscreen interface, offering seamless smartphone connectivity, and driver assistance features such as lane departure warning and adaptive cruise control.

The Aygo isn't far behind, featuring a user-friendly entertainment system with essential connectivity options. While it lacks some of the more advanced tech found in the Clio, it still offers a sufficient level of comfort for most urban users.

Conclusion: Choosing Your Champion

Deciding between the Renault Clio and Toyota Aygo ultimately hinges on personal preferences and requirements. If performance, interior space, and advanced technology are high on your list, the Clio is undoubtedly the better choice. Conversely, if you prefer a compact, economical vehicle that's easy to navigate through urban environments, the Aygo might be just what you need. Both cars have something to offer, fitting various lifestyles and needs in the busy landscape of modern driving.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Clio

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Clio is somewhat cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,791 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Aygo uses 3.7 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the Renault Clio with 4.1 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

Aygo

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio offers markedly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 9.2 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Clio delivers clearly more torque with 190 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Clio

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Clio offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Aygo is a bit lighter – 1,090 kg compared to 1,202 kg. The difference is around 112 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Clio offers markedly more boot space – 327 L compared to 231 L. That’s a difference of about 96 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries marginally more – 463 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 43 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Renault Clio
Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details

Toyota Aygo

The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.

details
Renault Clio
Toyota Aygo

Costs and Consumption

Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Price
18,800 - 24,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
92 - 115 g/km
co2
85 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Curb weight
1,090 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Trunk capacity
231 L
Length
4,116 mm
Length
-
Width
1,768 mm
Width
1,740 mm
Height
1,451 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 463 kg
Payload
420 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
116 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 Nm
Torque
120 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
85 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3

General

Model Year
2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Renault
Brand
Toyota
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.