VS

Renault Clio vs SEAT Ibiza - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (158 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (17100 £ vs 16800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Clio or SEAT Ibiza?

Clio

Renault Clio vs SEAT Ibiza: The Hatchback Showdown

In the dynamic realm of compact and versatile hatchbacks, two contenders consistently stand out — the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza. Both vehicles have established robust reputations in the automotive world, thanks to their blend of practicality, performance, and innovation. In this head-to-head comparison, we delve into the technical intricacies and innovative features that make each model a frontrunner in its class.

Ibiza

Performance and Engine Options

The Renault Clio offers a diverse range of engine types, including Full Hybrid, Petrol, and LPG options, catering to varying preferences and environmental concerns. The power spectrum ranges from 67 HP to a respectable 143 HP, and drivers can choose between automatic and manual transmissions. Its acceleration capabilities span from a brisk 9.3 seconds to a more relaxed 17.1 seconds to 100 km/h, with a top speed reaching up to 174 km/h.

In contrast, the SEAT Ibiza is powered by a selection of petrol engines ranging from 80 HP to 150 HP. The Ibiza's acceleration times vary from a rapid 8.1 seconds to 15.3 seconds for reaching 100 km/h. The model incorporates both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, topping out at a speed of 216 km/h, demonstrating a clear inclination towards a sporty drive.

Clio

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

When it comes to fuel consumption, the Renault Clio showcases commendable efficiency, particularly with its hybrid model boasting an impressive 4.3 L/100km. Petrol and LPG alternatives exhibit slightly higher consumption rates ranging up to 7 L/100km. The Ibiza, meanwhile, hovers around 5.1 to 5.7 L/100km across its petrol line-up, offering modest gains in fuel economy.

The CO2 emissions for both cars underscore their commitment to eco-friendliness. The Clio's emissions range from 97 g/km to 130 g/km, whereas the Ibiza maintains a similar range from 115 g/km to 128 g/km, placing both in the mid-range of CO2 efficiency classes.

Ibiza

Design and Dimensions

Both the Clio and the Ibiza sport a five-door hatchback configuration, blending aesthetic appeal with practicality. The Clio's dimensions are tailored for urban agility, measuring 4053 mm in length, 1798 mm in width, and 1440 mm in height. On the other hand, the Ibiza stretches slightly longer at 4059 mm, with a narrower breadth of 1780 mm, and stands taller at 1447 mm, offering a distinct road presence.

In terms of cargo space, the Clio provides 391 liters of trunk capacity, while the Ibiza offers a slightly larger 355 liters of space, accommodating the varied needs of drivers who require flexibility in storage.

Clio

Innovation and Features

Renault Clio continues to impress with its integration of technology aimed at enhancing driver experience and safety. Its full hybrid engine represents a significant leap towards ecological driving without compromising on performance.

Meanwhile, SEAT Ibiza leverages its refined dual-clutch automatic transmission to deliver seamless gear transitions, underscoring its focus on providing a sporty and engaging drive.

Ibiza

Final Verdict

In choosing between the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza, drivers are faced with a decision that hinges on personal preference, whether it’s the versatile engine choices and hybrid efficiency of the Clio or the spirited performance and contemporary styling of the Ibiza. Both vehicles offer compelling attributes, marking them as formidable contenders in the hatchback segment of the automotive market.

Ultimately, both the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza promise to deliver a rewarding driving experience, each in its unique way, catering to the nuanced desires of modern-day motorists.

Renault Clio

SEAT Ibiza

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

SEAT Ibiza has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 16800 £ , while the Renault Clio costs 17100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 215 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.10 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the SEAT Ibiza with 5 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio has a slight edge – offering 158 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the SEAT Ibiza is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.10 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: SEAT Ibiza pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 250 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, SEAT Ibiza is hardly perceptible lighter – 1111 kg compared to 1202 kg. The difference is around 91 kg.

In terms of boot space, the SEAT Ibiza offers hardly perceptible more room – 355 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

When it comes to payload, SEAT Ibiza slightly takes the win – 522 kg compared to 463 kg. That’s a difference of about 59 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £17,100
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.1 L
details

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

SEAT Ibiza

The SEAT Ibiza is a cheeky, well-priced hatchback that blends sharp styling with a grown-up driving character, making it a smart choice for city commuters who still want a bit of fun. Inside it's practical and neatly finished, with sensible kit and easygoing manners that make everyday life less fussy — a car that doesn't try too hard but gets the job done with a smile.

details
SEAT-Ibiza-FR_02_title
SEAT-Ibiza-FR_11_HQ
SEAT-Ibiza-FR_05_HQ
SEAT-Ibiza-FR_08_HQ
SEAT-Ibiza-FR_12_HQ

Reviews Renault Clio

Reviews SEAT Ibiza

Top Car Comparisons

SEAT Arona
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Think of the SEAT Arona as the chunky crossover that gives you a higher view of the road, more boot space and practical family-friendly packaging, while the SEAT Ibiza is the sharper, lighter hatch that’s more fun to hustle through town and returns better fuel economy. Pick the Arona if you want …
SEAT Ibiza
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the SEAT Ibiza showcases its sporty design and agile handling, making it a favorite for urban drivers seeking a bit of flair during their daily commute. Meanwhile, the Skoda Fabia impresses with its practicality and generous interior space, offering a more …
Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza

Costs and Consumption
Price
17100 - 23700 £
Price
16800 - 28800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.7 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
92 - 115 g/km
co2
114 - 128 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1202 - 1316 kg
Curb weight
1111 - 1231 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Trunk capacity
355 L
Length
4116 mm
Length
-
Width
1768 mm
Width
1780 mm
Height
1451 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1094 - 1176 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 463 kg
Payload
489 - 522 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
80 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 15.3 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 Nm
Torque
95 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
59 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Renault
Brand
SEAT

Similar Comparisons

Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive realm of compact cars, the Hyundai i10 stands out with its impressive maneuverability and surprising interior space, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio captivates with its stylish design and advanced technology features, offering a more …
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the MG3 takes on the Renault Clio, offering an impressive mix of practicality and style for the price-conscious consumer. While the Clio boasts a more refined interior and a well-established reputation, the MG3 stands out with its generous warranty and …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of the superminis, the Citroën C3 and Renault Clio each bring their unique flair to the table. The C3 impresses with its distinctive design and customizable features, attracting those who prioritize style and individuality. Meanwhile, the Clio excels in driving dynamics and interior …
Hyundai i20
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive segment of compact hatchbacks, the Hyundai i20 and Renault Clio stand out with distinctive attributes. The Hyundai i20 impresses with its tech-laden interior and efficient performance, making it a practical choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio offers a blend …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
In the ever-popular Renault Captur versus Renault Clio showdown, drivers can expect distinct advantages in both compact versatility and sporty handling. The Captur shines with its higher driving position and spacious interior, making it ideal for urban adventures and family outings. Meanwhile, the …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault Clio
Toyota Aygo
VS
In the competitive showdown between the Renault Clio and the Toyota Aygo, both compact champions present unique appeals to urban drivers. The Clio boasts a more spacious interior and refined driving dynamics, making it ideal for those who prioritize comfort and performance. In contrast, the Aygo …
Ford Puma
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who crave a more dynamic experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio impresses with its sleek aesthetics and practicality, offering a more refined ride and …
Is the Renault Clio offered with different drivetrains?

The Renault Clio is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.