Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Skoda Superb Limousine comparison
Compare performance (186 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Skoda Superb Limousine?
Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Skoda Superb Limousine: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
3 Hatchback
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda 3 Hatchback is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Skoda Superb Limousine costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,037 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Limousine uses 1.2 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 4.4 L/100km.
Superb Limousine
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers noticeably more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 86 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Limousine is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.6 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Superb Limousine delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.
3 Hatchback
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is slightly lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 1,559 kg. The difference is around 142 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers considerably more boot space – 645 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 294 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Superb Limousine carries slightly more – 580 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Limousine is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £35,100
Skoda Superb Limousine
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Skoda Superb Limousine
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda 3 Hatchback
The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.
details
Skoda Superb Limousine
The Skoda Superb is the quietly imposing saloon that turns everyday practicality into tasteful luxury, with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and a boot that swallows groceries and luggage with military discipline. For buyers who want executive presence without the badge snobbery, it’s a clever, polished choice that rewards sensible thinking with genuine comfort and pragmatic charm.
details
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Skoda Superb Limousine
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
|
Price
35,100 - 52,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
131 - 140 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
co2
26 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
|
Curb weight
1,559 - 1,896 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
Trunk capacity
486 - 645 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
487 - 502 kg
|
Payload
441 - 580 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.