VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Mitsubishi Outlander – Differences & prices compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda 3 Sedan or Mitsubishi Outlander fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda 3 Sedan has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25000 £, while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 17871 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Outlander manages with 0.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.50 L. The difference is about 4.70 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 306 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 120 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Outlander is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.10 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda 3 Sedan performs evident better – reaching 216 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 46 km/h.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda 3 Sedan is convincingly lighter – 1420 kg compared to 2070 kg. The difference is around 650 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers barely noticeable more room – 495 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 45 L.

When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Outlander slightly takes the win – 595 kg compared to 481 kg. That’s a difference of about 114 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi Outlander proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi Outlander is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £42,800

Mitsubishi Outlander

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.80 L
  • Electric Range : 83 - 85 km
details

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan stands out with its elegant and sleek design, capturing attention on the road with its refined aesthetics. Inside, it offers a well-crafted and comfortable cabin, providing a pleasurable driving experience marked by quality materials and advanced features. The car's performance is reliable and smooth, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and long-distance journeys.

details

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1)
rate

The Outlander continues to impress with its spacious interior and versatile seating options, making it a top choice for families on the go. With its sleek design and thoughtful features, this SUV effortlessly combines style and practicality, ensuring a comfortable ride for all passengers. Additionally, the Outlander's advanced safety technologies provide peace of mind, making it a reliable companion for both daily commutes and weekend adventures.

details

Similar Comparisons

Nissan X-Trail
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV market, the Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander stand out with their distinct features and capabilities. The X-Trail boasts a spacious interior and advanced safety technology, making it an excellent choice for families, while the Outlander impresses with its …
Mitsubishi Outlander
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive landscape of modern SUVs, the Mitsubishi Outlander and Volkswagen Tayron stand out for their distinct offerings. The Mitsubishi Outlander impresses with its robust all-wheel-drive system and a comfortable, family-oriented interior, making it a versatile choice for both urban and …
Mazda 3 Sedan
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption
Price
25000 - 34200 £
Price
42800 - 51000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 135 g/km
co2
19 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
51 L
Fuel tank capacity
53 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
1420 - 1492 kg
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
495 L
Length
4660 mm
Length
4719 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1862 mm
Height
1440 mm
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
Payload
467 - 481 kg
Payload
545 - 595 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Max Speed
203 - 216 km/h
Max Speed
170 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
2360 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Karoq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Mitsubishi Outlander compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mitsubishi Outlander
Lynk & Co 08
VS
Unsure whether the Mitsubishi Outlander or the Lynk & Co 08 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Kuga
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mitsubishi Outlander both bring strong attributes to the compact SUV market, yet cater to slightly different audiences. The Kuga is praised for its sporty handling and modern, tech-rich interior, making it an appealing option for urban drivers who appreciate a sleek design. On the …
Kia Sorento
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Kia Sorento and Mitsubishi Outlander compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda 3 Sedan
Peugeot Traveller
VS
The Mazda 3 Sedan and Peugeot Traveller compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-60
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
Mazda CX-60 and Mitsubishi Outlander go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
SEAT Ateca
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
SEAT Ateca and Mitsubishi Outlander go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Volvo XC60
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
Unsure whether the Volvo XC60 or the Mitsubishi Outlander is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.