Compare performance (243 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Mitsubishi Outlander?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The compact SUV segment has been a battleground of utility and innovation. Today, we're comparing two prominent players: the Ford Kuga and the Mitsubishi Outlander. Both 2024 models are ideal for families seeking practicality without compromising on modern technology.
The Ford Kuga offers a versatile engine lineup with petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid options. The petrol engine delivers a robust 150 HP, while the plug-in hybrid option pushes up to 243 HP. Its top speed varies up to 200 km/h, with acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.3 seconds for the hybrid variant.
In contrast, the Mitsubishi Outlander is available solely as a plug-in hybrid, offering a potent 306 HP. Despite its higher curb weight, it accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.9 seconds, with a top speed limited to 170 km/h.
Both vehicles are designed with efficiency at their core. The Kuga's plug-in hybrid boasts an impressive consumption of just 0.9 L/100km and a noteworthy electric range of 69 km. The Outlander marginally outperforms with a consumption of 0.8 L/100km and an electric range extending up to 86 km.
Inside, both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers. The Kuga offers a trunk capacity of 412 liters, which might be compact for some, compared to the Outlander's larger 495-liter space, demonstrating its superiority in terms of cargo utility.
The Outlander is slightly larger, measuring 4719 mm in length and up to 1750 mm in height, contributing to its more rugged aesthetic. The Kuga maintains a sleek appearance with lengths varied between 4604 mm and 4645 mm and heights up to 1681 mm. This gives the Kuga a more urban appeal, favoring those navigating tight city streets.
Both models are equipped with cutting-edge technology. The Kuga capitalizes on Ford’s latest infotainment system, offering seamless smartphone integration and adaptive driving features. The Outlander, on the other hand, focuses on electrification with an expansive battery capacity and more significant electric-only driving benefits.
The choice between the Ford Kuga and the Mitsubishi Outlander will largely depend on what you prioritize. If you value engine variety and a sporty drive, the Kuga could be your ideal match. Meanwhile, if fuel efficiency and cargo space lead your checklist, the Outlander’s efficient plug-in hybrid system and larger trunk make it an attractive option for the eco-conscious driver.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Kuga is markedly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,606 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Outlander uses 2.6 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers a bit more range – reaching up to 85 km, about 17 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers markedly more power – delivering 306 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.3 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.9 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is markedly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 544 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Outlander carries very slightly more – 595 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
The Ford Kuga is narrowly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
Price
42,800 - 53,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
60 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,120 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
545 - 595 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España