Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Kuga vs Mitsubishi Outlander - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (243 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (34200 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Mitsubishi Outlander?
Kuga
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Kuga has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34200 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8606 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Outlander manages with 0.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.80 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Outlander performs to a small extent better – achieving up to 85 km, about 17 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Outlander
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a noticeable edge – offering 306 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Kuga is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.90 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Kuga performs a bit better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kuga
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Kuga is noticeable lighter – 1526 kg compared to 2070 kg. The difference is around 544 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers to a small extent more room – 495 L compared to 412 L. That’s a difference of about 83 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Kuga performs minimal better – up to 1534 L, which is about 130 L more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.
When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Outlander minimal takes the win – 595 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mitsubishi Outlander proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi Outlander is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £42,800
Mitsubishi Outlander
Ford Kuga
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Kuga
4.1 (4 Reviews)
The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.
details
Mitsubishi Outlander
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.
details
Ford Kuga
Mitsubishi Outlander
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34200 - 46300 £
|
Price
42800 - 51000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
1.1 - 14.4 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
co2
19 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
53 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1526 - 1859 kg
|
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
412 L
|
Trunk capacity
495 L
|
|
Length
4604 - 4645 mm
|
Length
4719 mm
|
|
Width
1882 mm
|
Width
1862 mm
|
|
Height
1673 - 1681 mm
|
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1534 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
|
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Payload
545 - 595 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
-
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
Power HP
306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
Power kW
225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2360 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
What drivetrain options does the Ford Kuga have?
The Ford Kuga is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.