VS

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Sedan or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Mazda 3 Sedan vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Sedan

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Mazda 3 Sedan costs 25,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,329 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers significantly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda 3 Sedan is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.1 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda 3 Sedan delivers clearly more torque with 240 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 138 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 480 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers substantially more boot space – 450 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 215 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Sedan carries somewhat more – 481 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda 3 Sedan stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,000
3 Sedan

Mazda 3 Sedan

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda 2
Mazda 3 Sedan
VS
Choosing between the city‑savvy Mazda2 and the more grown-up Mazda3 Sedan comes down to whether you prioritize low running costs and easy urban manoeuvrability or a roomier cabin, stronger performance and extra tech. I’ll compare the key points — size, engines, economy, equipment and driving feel — …
Fiat 500
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the realm of compact cars, the Fiat 500 and Mitsubishi Space Star offer distinct yet enticing options for urban drivers. The Fiat 500, with its iconic retro design and nimble handling, appeals to those who prioritize style and city maneuverability. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Space Star …
Mazda 3 Sedan
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Sedan

The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.

details
serpimg_ikGkXb

Reviews Mazda 3 Sedan

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Kia Picanto
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Space Star go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mitsubishi Colt
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Mitsubishi Colt and Mitsubishi Space Star offer unique appeals to different drivers. The Colt shines with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it an exciting choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Space Star prioritizes practicality and fuel …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Toyota Aygo
VS
In the competitive realm of compact city cars, the Mitsubishi Space Star and Toyota Aygo stand out with their unique blend of style and efficiency. The Space Star offers a surprisingly spacious interior and excellent fuel economy, making it a practical choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Aygo …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Mitsubishi Space Star, known for its spacious interior and fuel efficiency, caters well to urban drivers seeking practicality without sacrificing comfort. On the other hand, the Toyota Yaris stands out with its dynamic handling and advanced safety features, appealing to those who prioritize a …
CUPRA Leon
Mazda 3 Sedan
VS
CUPRA Leon and Mazda 3 Sedan go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Hyundai i10
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the battle of compact city cars, the Hyundai i10 impresses with its stylish design and user-friendly tech features, making it a top choice for urban drivers. On the other hand, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers a spacious interior and exceptional fuel efficiency, catering well to those seeking …
Hyundai i20
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the compact hatchback segment, the Hyundai i20 stands out with its modern design and tech-savvy interior, offering features that cater to tech enthusiasts. In contrast, the Mitsubishi Space Star provides practicality and excellent fuel efficiency, making it an appealing choice for …
Kia XCeed
Mazda 3 Sedan
VS
In a compelling showdown between practicality and performance, the Kia XCeed and Mazda 3 Sedan offer distinct advantages for drivers. The XCeed impresses with its spacious interior and elevated ride height, making it an ideal choice for urban explorers seeking versatility. Meanwhile, the Mazda 3 …
Mazda 3 Sedan
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,000 - 34,200 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
123 - 135 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,492 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
450 L
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
-
Length
3,845 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
-
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
467 - 481 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi
What drivetrain options does the Mazda 3 Sedan have?

The Mazda 3 Sedan is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.