Compare performance (141 HP vs 326 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 38,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or BMW X1?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-5 stand out as dynamic contenders. Both models offer robust performance, comfort, and cutting-edge technology, catering to a diverse clientele. This article delves into the technical aspects and innovations of these two vehicles to help potential buyers make an informed decision.
The BMW X1 offers a versatile range of engine options, including petrol, diesel, mild hybrid (MHEV), and plug-in hybrid variants. With power outputs ranging from 136 HP to an exhilarating 326 HP, the X1's engines deliver versatility in performance. The dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures seamless gear changes, providing a smooth and responsive driving experience.
On the other hand, the Mazda CX-5 is available with petrol and diesel engines equipped with MHEV technology. With horsepower spanning from 150 HP to 194 HP, the CX-5 provides a reliable and consistent ride. The option between manual and automatic gearboxes allows drivers to select their preferred driving style, while still maintaining impressive efficiency.
BMW’s commitment to sustainability is evident in the X1's impressive fuel consumption, particularly the plug-in hybrid which boasts as low as 0.8 L/100 km. Moreover, the plug-in hybrid X1 offers an electric range of 83 kilometers, making it an excellent choice for city commuting with reduced emissions.
The Mazda CX-5 demonstrates competitive fuel efficiency with an average consumption between 5.6 to 7.6 L/100 km. However, when it comes to CO2 emissions, the X1 emerges as the eco-friendlier option. BMW's advanced MHEV and plug-in technologies significantly reduce carbon footprints, whereas the CX-5 is positioned slightly higher on the emission scale.
Both the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-5 are designed to ensure passenger comfort. The X1 accommodates five passengers, providing a roomy environment with a trunk capacity of up to 540 liters. The dimensions of 4505 mm in length and 1845 mm in width offer a balance between an agile city ride and ample interior space.
The Mazda CX-5 extends slightly longer with a length of 4575 mm but maintains the same width, allowing for a spacious cabin and a trunk capacity of 522 liters. Its elevated height of 1680 mm gives a more commanding road presence and additional headroom.
BMW's hallmark driving pleasure is evident in the X1's dynamic handling and all-wheel drive capability, offering superior road grip and stability. The X1’s top speed of 250 km/h and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5.4 seconds in its top variant offer thrilling performance.
Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-5 retains its reputation for efficiency over speed, with a top speed of 208 km/h and acceleration times starting from 9.2 seconds. Its advanced safety features and driving aids ensure a safe journey, rendering the CX-5 a reliable family vehicle.
Deciding between the BMW X1 and Mazda CX-5 ultimately depends on personal preferences. The BMW X1 is suitable for those prioritizing performance, luxury, and cutting-edge hybrid technology, though it may come with a higher price tag. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 is a more budget-friendly choice, offering dependable performance and practicality without compromising on essential comfort and safety features.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-5 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the BMW X1 costs 38,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,666 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X1 uses 2.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.5 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X1 offers substantially more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 185 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 5.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X1 delivers considerably more torque with 477 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 239 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW X1 is barely lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 54 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X1 offers moderately more boot space – 540 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 74 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries slightly more – 601 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 101 kg.
The BMW X1 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.
details
The BMW X1 delivers BMW's sporty driving character in a compact premium crossover package, making daily driving both engaging and practical. With a refined cabin, flexible cargo space and composed handling, it's a smart choice for buyers who want luxury and versatility without compromise.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
|
Price
38,700 - 56,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
81 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
157 - 169 g/km
|
co2
57 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
566 - 601 kg
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
BMW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España