Compare performance (326 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (38,200 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW X1 or VW T-Roc?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The BMW X1 and the VW T-Roc are two titans in the compact SUV market, offering drivers a balance of performance, technology, and style. Both vehicles have their unique strengths, catering to different preferences. Let’s delve into their technical details and innovations to see how they stack up against each other.
When it comes to design, the BMW X1 and VW T-Roc both exude a distinctively modern and sleek aesthetic. The X1 measures 4500 mm in length, offering a slightly larger presence on the road compared to the T-Roc's 4271 mm. The X1's width is 1845 mm, providing a broader stance than the T-Roc's 1819 mm. In terms of height, the X1 stands at 1642 mm, taller than the T-Roc's 1584 mm, contributing to its more commanding SUV silhouette.
The BMW X1 offers a versatile range of engines including diesel, petrol, mild hybrid (MHEV), and plug-in hybrid options. It delivers a power output ranging from 136 HP to a robust 326 HP in its advanced models. Notably, the X1 can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 5.4 seconds, showcasing its prowess in speed and agility. The maximum speed achieved by the X1 is an impressive 250 km/h, highlighting its capabilities on the open road.
The Volkswagen T-Roc offers petrol and diesel engines, providing power outputs from 115 HP to 300 HP. It accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in about 4.9 seconds at its peak performance, illustrating its sporty character. The T-Roc's top speed reaches up to 250 km/h, matching the X1's performance in high-speed scenarios.
For the environmentally conscious driver, the BMW X1's plug-in hybrid variant offers a remarkable electric range of 83 km on a full charge, with a minimal consumption of 0.8 L/100 km. CO2 emissions range from 17 to 175 g/km depending on the model.
On the other hand, the VW T-Roc provides an efficient consumption spectrum from 4.7 to 8.5 L/100 km, with CO2 emissions between 125 to 194 g/km. The T-Roc doesn't feature a plug-in hybrid option, which can be a tipping point for eco-conscious buyers.
Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers. However, when it comes to trunk capacity, the BMW X1 offers more room with up to 540 liters, making it a more practical choice for families or those needing additional cargo space. The T-Roc, though slightly more compact, provides up to 445 liters of boot space, still treating occupants to a versatile utility.
BMW's reputation for cutting-edge technology is evident in the X1, featuring an array of driver assistance systems and connectivity options. Its enhanced infotainment system and advanced safety features ensure a futuristic driving experience.
Volkswagen doesn’t fall short either, with the T-Roc boasting a suite of tech-savvy features, including a modern infotainment platform and intelligent safety systems that offer peace of mind on the road.
The choice between the BMW X1 and the VW T-Roc boils down to personal preferences and priorities. The X1 might appeal to those in search of powerful performance, advanced hybrid options, and more space. Meanwhile, the T-Roc serves as an excellent choice for those desiring sporty dynamics and efficiency at a potentially lower entry price. Both vehicles stand out as strong contenders in the bustling SUV market, each bringing unique strengths to the table.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
VW T-Roc is significantly cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the BMW X1 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,790 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the BMW X1 uses 2.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X1 offers substantially more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 176 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X1 delivers significantly more torque with 477 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 227 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is marginally lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,575 kg. The difference is around 110 kg.
Looking at boot space, the BMW X1 offers substantially more boot space – 540 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 256 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries marginally more – 515 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
The BMW X1 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BMW X1 brings a premium feel to compact crossover life, wrapping practical space and agile handling into a tidy, upscale package. It’s ideal for buyers who want BMW driving dynamics without the bulk, offering everyday comfort and a few clever tricks to keep the commute interesting.
details
The VW T‑Roc feels noticeably more grown‑up than before, with a much nicer cabin, sensible physical controls and a calm, well‑insulated ride that makes long trips comfortable. It’s compact and city‑friendly with practical rear seating, but the sloping roofline reduces rear headroom and tempting options can quickly push the price up, so buyers after maximum space or a sporty feel may want to consider alternatives.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
38,200 - 55,500 £
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
81 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
14.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
57 - 175 g/km
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 - 54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
|
Length
4,500 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
|
Height
1,630 - 1,642 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,495 - 1,545 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 233 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España