VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Kia K4 comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 180 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 24,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Kia K4?

Mazda CX-5 vs Kia K4: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
details

Kia K4

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Kia K4 is markedly cheaper – starting at 24,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,229 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Kia K4 uses 5.8 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

K4

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Kia K4 offers markedly more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Kia K4 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.4 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Kia K4 delivers somewhat more torque with 265 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 27 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Kia K4 is a bit lighter – 1,415 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 214 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Kia K4 offers clearly more boot space – 604 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 138 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries noticeably more – 601 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 146 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Kia K4 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,800
K4

Kia K4

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 180 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.8 - 7.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Honda ZR-V
Mazda CX-5
VS
Choosing between the Honda ZR-V and the Mazda CX-5 comes down to whether you prioritize roomy practicality and efficiency or sharper driving dynamics and a more premium cabin. The ZR-V leans toward user-friendly space, good fuel economy and value, while the CX-5 delivers engaging handling, stronger …
Mazda CX-5
Kia K4

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Kia K4

Kia K4 shakes up the compact-sedan crowd with concept-car looks, a smartly packaged cabin, and the kind of easygoing refinement that makes rush hour feel less like a chore. It blends value, tech, and a dash of attitude, serving up a smooth, confident drive that might have you taking the long way home just to show off those angles.

details
serpimg_SfmUuV

Reviews Kia K4

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Owners tend to praise the Kia K4 as a modern, very easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and driver-assist features that work reliably. Typical negatives often mentioned are a sluggish gearbox and weak cabin soundproofing that lets in more noise than expected. Overall the feedback is fairly consistent on those strengths and drawbacks.
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:45

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but with a sluggish gearbox and poor noise insulation.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:45

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but with a sluggish gearbox and poor soundproofing.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:44

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but with a sluggish gearbox and poor noise insulation.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:44

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but with a sluggish gearbox and poor sound insulation.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Joz
20 May 2026, 08:04:44

A modern, ultra-easy-to-use car with a full set of systems and assistants that work as they should, but hampered by a sluggish gearbox and poor soundproofing.

Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Nissan X-Trail
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 and Nissan X-Trail stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-5 offers a more upscale interior and a sportier driving experience, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and performance. Meanwhile, the …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Skoda Kodiaq comes down to whether you value driving finesse and cabin refinement or space and practicality. The CX-5 shines with engaging handling and an upscale interior, while the Kodiaq offers more passenger room, flexible seating and strong …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of SUVs, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its blend of sporty handling and upscale interior, making it a favorite among driving enthusiasts who don't want to compromise on comfort. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC60 stands out with a suite of advanced safety features and a luxurious Scandinavian …
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-5
VS
Unsure whether the BYD Seal U or the Mazda CX-5 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Kia XCeed
Kia K4
VS
The Kia XCeed and Kia K4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-5
Kia K4

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
24,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.8 - 7.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
132 - 161 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback, Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,415 - 1,540 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
328 - 604 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
435 - 455 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
115 - 180 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
200 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
85 - 132 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
998 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Kia
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.