VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Mazda CX-5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • slightly lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda CX-5 is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,294 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers considerably more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers considerably more torque with 540 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 302 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is slightly lighter – 1,629 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 163 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers somewhat more boot space – 583 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 111 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries marginally more – 601 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,300
Range Rover Evoque

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 - 67 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Mazda CX-5
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15)
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Mazda CX-5
VW T-Roc
VS
In the ever-competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique blends of performance and style. The Mazda CX-5 impresses with its refined interior and sporty handling, making it a driver's delight on winding roads. Meanwhile, the VW T-Roc offers a fun and …
Mazda CX-5
SEAT Ateca
VS
Mazda CX-5 and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Mercedes GLC
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
The Mercedes GLC and the Range Rover Evoque present a compelling choice for luxury SUV enthusiasts. The GLC is renowned for its blend of comfort, technology, and efficient performance, making it an excellent option for those who prioritize a smooth driving experience. On the other hand, the Evoque …
Omoda 5
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
The Omoda 5 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
BYD Seal
Mazda CX-5
VS
The BYD Seal and Mazda CX-5 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-5
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
4,690 mm
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
601 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.