@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Which model is better for everyday use?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-5 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-5 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £. That’s a price difference of around 13285 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque manages with 3.70 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.

Range Rover Evoque @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a decisively edge – offering 269 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.20 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 3.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque performs barely noticeable better – reaching 213 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 18 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque pulls significantly stronger with 540 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 302 Nm difference.

CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is somewhat lighter – 1629 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 163 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers slightly more room – 583 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 111 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs convincingly better – up to 2019 L, which is about 863 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Who wins the race?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £43,300
Range Rover Evoque @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.7 - 7.8 L
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Mazda CX-5

3 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1) @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1 (1)
rate

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big @ Jaguar Land Rover Media
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045 @ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15) @ Jaguar Land Rover Media
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03 @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
Mazda CX-5
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
CX-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
Range Rover Evoque @ Jaguar Land Rover Media

Costs and Consumption
Price
30000 - 39500 £
Price
43300 - 64800 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1629 - 1671 kg
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
Trunk capacity
583 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
4690 mm
Length
4371 mm
Width
1860 mm
Width
1900 mm
Height
1695 mm
Height
1649 mm
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
Payload
-
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In a competitive segment, the Ford Kuga and Mazda CX-5 stand out with distinct personalities, offering drivers a blend of style and functionality. While the Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced tech features, the CX-5 captivates with its dynamic handling and upscale interior …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-30
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-5 both showcase the brand's signature blend of style and performance. While the CX-30 offers a more agile driving experience with its smaller footprint, the CX-5 impresses with its spacious interior and powerful engine options. Ultimately, …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW X1
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Unsure whether the BMW X1 or the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more spirited experience behind the wheel. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 charms with its robust safety features and Scandinavian-inspired interior, prioritizing comfort and …
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Grandland
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Unsure whether the Opel Grandland or the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its bold design and dynamic performance, appealing to driving enthusiasts who crave a sportier feel. On the other hand, the Mazda CX-5 offers a more refined ride with its upscale interior and focus on comfort, making …
@ Kia Corporation
Kia Sportage
@ Jaguar Land Rover Media
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
The Kia Sportage and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?

The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.