Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-5 vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (141 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (30000 £ vs 61900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?
CX-5
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda CX-5 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30000 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31885 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Velar manages with 4.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L. The difference is about 2.20 L per 100 km.
Range Rover Velar
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a decisively edge – offering 404 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 263 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.50 s. That’s about 5.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs evident better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-5 tops out at 195 km/h. The difference is around 55 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls convincingly stronger with 650 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 412 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
CX-5
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda CX-5 is distinct lighter – 1629 kg compared to 2003 kg. The difference is around 374 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers hardly perceptible more room – 583 L compared to 552 L. That’s a difference of about 31 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-5 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2019 L, which is about 661 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Who wins the race?
The Land Rover Range Rover Velar proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Land Rover Range Rover Velar is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £61,900
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Mazda CX-5
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-5
4.5 (4 Reviews)
The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
Mazda CX-5
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30000 - 39500 £
|
Price
61900 - 87400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
|
co2
157 - 168 g/km
|
co2
110 - 232 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1629 - 1671 kg
|
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
583 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
4690 mm
|
Length
4797 mm
|
|
Width
1860 mm
|
Width
1933 mm
|
|
Height
1695 mm
|
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2019 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
141 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 km/h
|
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
238 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
104 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-5 have?
The Mazda CX-5 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.