VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Mitsubishi ASX?

Mazda CX-5 vs Mitsubishi ASX: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
details

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi ASX is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,229 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.7 L/100km.

ASX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX offers slightly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 17 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi ASX delivers very slightly more torque with 245 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is markedly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 333 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers only slightly more boot space – 484 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries noticeably more – 601 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 156 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,800
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.3 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact SUVs that blend style, comfort and day-to-day practicality for buyers who want a premium feel without stepping up to a large luxury brand. The CX-5 leans toward engaging driving dynamics and an upscale, tactile cabin, while the XC40 prioritizes …
Mazda CX-5
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (11 Reviews)
rate
Ghighi
26 Jul 2026, 15:53:31

Mazda is much better designed. Audis are pretty ugly overall, especially the "Q" series.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marc Adriaans
4 Jun 2026, 13:04:31

I've been driving Mazdas for about ten years now without problems and with a lot of enjoyment. The last 3.5 years in a CX‑5. A really nice, smooth car that can tow quite a bit too, although I wouldn't recommend doing that with the FWD because it lacks grip on the front axle — so if you fit a towbar always choose the AWD. The only downside I can think of, after long consideration, is... nothing 🤔

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Jaguar F-Pace
Mazda CX-5
VS
Comparing the Jaguar F‑Pace and the Mazda CX‑5 pits a sporty, luxury-oriented midsize SUV against a sharply styled, value-focused compact crossover — a matchup of premium feel and driving dynamics versus everyday practicality and efficiency. Choose the F‑Pace if you prioritize performance, brand …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Kia Sportage
Mazda CX-5
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Kia Sportage and Mazda CX-5 stand out with their distinct design philosophies and driving dynamics. While the Sportage offers a spacious interior and an array of advanced tech features, the CX-5 is celebrated for its engaging handling and upscale cabin …
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
SEAT Ateca
VS
Mazda CX-5 and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the SEAT Ateca …
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Mitsubishi ASX and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritize straightforward, durable value and simple packaging (ASX) or a more stylish, configurable small SUV with clever cabin packaging and tech (Captur). I’ll quickly compare how they stack up for space, …
Mitsubishi ASX
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
Comparing the Mitsubishi ASX and the Mitsubishi Grandis helps you decide whether you need a compact crossover that’s easy in town or a roomy MPV designed for family duty. I’ll point out the key differences in space, driving character, fuel economy and running costs so you can quickly see which fits …
Mazda CX-5
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
99 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
397 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.