VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Vauxhall Mokka comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 23,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Vauxhall Mokka?

Mazda CX-5 vs Vauxhall Mokka: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Vauxhall Mokka

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

CX-5

Design and Dimensions

When comparing the Mazda CX-5 and the Opel Mokka, the first noticeable difference is in their design language and size. The Mazda CX-5 exhibits a sleek, more elongated design, measuring 4575 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and 1680 mm in height. This makes it a substantial presence on the road. In contrast, the Opel Mokka is more compact and urban-friendly, with dimensions of 4150 mm in length, 1787 mm in width, and 1535 mm in height. This smaller size offers better maneuverability in tight city spaces.

Mokka

Engine and Performance

The engine options for these two SUVs cater to different driving preferences. The CX-5 offers a range of petrol mild hybrid (MHEV) and diesel engines, with power outputs ranging from 150 to 194 HP. The diesel variants of the CX-5 provide robust torque levels up to 445 Nm, making them ideal for drivers requiring more pulling power. The CX-5 can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in about 9.2 to 11.1 seconds, depending on the engine choice.

The Opel Mokka is available with petrol, petrol MHEV, and electric powertrains. The petrol engines in the Mokka deliver between 130 HP and 156 HP, with torque figures peaking at 260 Nm. Notably, the electric version of the Mokka provides a quiet and zero-emissions drive, achieving a driving range of up to 403 km on a full charge. For those favoring performance, the Mokka accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 9 seconds.

CX-5

Fuel Efficiency and Environmental Impact

Fuel efficiency can significantly influence the ownership experience. The Mazda CX-5 delivers fuel consumption figures ranging from 5.6 to 7.6 L/100km, making the diesel variants particularly appealing for long-distance drivers. However, its CO2 emissions range from 146 to 173 g/km, which places it in the E and F CO2 efficiency classes.

The Opel Mokka offers commendable fuel consumption figures, especially in its MHEV form, ranging from 4.8 to 6.2 L/100km. Additionally, the electric Mokka impresses with zero CO2 emissions, placing it in the top CO2 efficiency class A, highlighting its eco-friendly credentials.

Mokka

Interior Comfort and Practicality

Both SUVs offer seating for five passengers, but the Mazda CX-5 focuses more on spaciousness, clearly visible in its trunk capacity of 522 L compared to the Mokka's 350 L. The CX-5 is the ideal vehicle for families needing extra cargo space frequently. On the other hand, the Mokka emphasizes style and urban practicality, suitable for more compact needs.

CX-5

Innovations and Features

The Mazda CX-5 is known for incorporating innovative safety features and driver assistance technologies to ensure a safer driving experience. This includes advanced driving aids that are a hallmark of Mazda’s design ethos. Meanwhile, the Opel Mokka boasts the latest connectivity options and infotainment systems, catering to tech-savvy drivers who value in-car entertainment and navigation interfaces.

Mokka

Conclusion

The choice between the Mazda CX-5 and the Opel Mokka ultimately comes down to individual preferences and requirements. If interior space, power, and a broader range of drivetrain options are top priorities, the Mazda CX-5 stands out as a strong contender. Conversely, the Opel Mokka offers modern design, efficient urban driving, and electric variants for eco-conscious buyers. Both vehicles highlight significant advancements in technology and design in the competitive SUV market.

Frequently compared as well

Opel Frontera
Opel Mokka
VS
Comparing the Opel Frontera and the Opel Mokka highlights two very different takes on the SUV idea: the Frontera is a rugged, older off‑road capable SUV, while the Mokka is a modern compact crossover built for city life and efficiency. This short guide will walk through their real‑world strengths …
Opel Astra
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Astra is the grown-up compact — practical, composed and roomy enough for weekend gear, while the Opel Mokka trades boot space for a higher driving position, sharper looks and crossover sass. Pick the Astra for better value, comfort and lower running costs; choose the Mokka if you crave …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Vauxhall Mokka is visibly cheaper – starting at 23,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,943 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Mokka uses 4.9 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

Mokka

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Mokka offers substantially more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 141 HP. That’s roughly 140 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Mokka is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the Mazda CX-5 takes 10.5 s. That’s about 4.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Mokka delivers visibly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 107 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Mokka is markedly lighter – 1,294 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-5 offers noticeably more boot space – 466 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 116 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-5 carries noticeably more – 601 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 201 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Vauxhall Mokka is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,000
Mokka

Vauxhall Mokka

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 136 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 336 - 403 km
details
Mazda CX-5
Vauxhall Mokka

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends sporty handling with a refined, premium interior, making everyday driving feel engaging and comfortable. It pairs stylish design and thoughtful cabin materials with user-friendly tech to deliver a well-rounded compact SUV that suits drivers who want more driver involvement without sacrificing practicality.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Vauxhall Mokka

The Opel Mokka is a compact crossover that blends bold, modern styling with a practical, city-friendly footprint. It delivers a comfortable ride and a well-appointed interior with straightforward tech, making it a smart choice for urban drivers who want a stylish yet sensible small SUV.

details
001_Opel-Mokka-512749
006_Opel-Mokka-512753
005_Opel-Mokka-512752
015_Opel-Mokka-512759
011_Opel-Mokka-513096

Reviews Vauxhall Mokka

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
yannick
18 Apr 2026, 11:17:27

I've been an Opel owner for 34 years and am very satisfied with the brand — my choice will be an easy one.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Opel Corsa
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Corsa is the cheeky city hatch that zips into parking spaces and pockets with equal ease, while the Opel Mokka trades that nimble charm for SUV attitude, a higher driving position and a few extra inches of boot space. If you want affordable fun and frugal running costs, pick the Corsa; if …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 helps you decide between a practical, well-rounded compact SUV and a more spacious, premium model that offers stronger engines and available plug-in hybrid technology. The CX-5 is ideal for buyers prioritizing value, comfort and lower running costs, while …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
Choosing between the Mazda CX-5 and the Volkswagen Tayron means picking either Mazda’s engaging, driver-focused compact SUV or Volkswagen’s more conservative, comfort- and tech-oriented Tayron. Below I’ll compare design, driving feel, interior quality, practicality and features so you can quickly …
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Opel Grandland
Opel Mokka
VS
The Opel Grandland feels like the sensible grown-up in the family — roomy, softly suspended and better suited to long journeys or a big grocery run, while the Opel Mokka is the cheeky urbanite: compact, bold-looking and blissfully easy to park. Pick the Grandland for space and comfort, the Mokka if …
Nissan Qashqai
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Qashqai and Opel Mokka are two popular compact SUVs that take very different approaches: the Qashqai focuses on roomy practicality and comfortable family motoring, while the Mokka favours bold styling and nimble city driving. Below I'll outline the key differences in space, driving feel, …
Opel Mokka
Peugeot 2008
VS
Opel Mokka brings punchy engines, chunky SUV looks and a practical, straightforward cabin that’s easy to live with — ideal if you want fuss-free value and a touch of rugged charm. The Peugeot 2008 bets on style and tech, with a striking interior, nimble handling and the addictive i‑Cockpit layout, …
Mazda CX-5
Vauxhall Mokka

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
23,000 - 40,500 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
336 - 403 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 169 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,294 - 1,672 kg
Trunk capacity
466 L
Trunk capacity
310 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,787 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
566 - 601 kg
Payload
388 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
136 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Vauxhall
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.