VS

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Kangoo comparison

Compare performance (141 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-5 or Renault Kangoo?

Mazda CX-5 vs Renault Kangoo: Key differences

Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h

Renault Kangoo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
  • markedly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-5

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Kangoo is somewhat cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Mazda CX-5 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,277 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Kangoo uses 5.2 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mazda CX-5 with 7 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

Kangoo

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-5 offers marginally more power – delivering 141 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 11 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-5 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 10.5 s, while the Renault Kangoo takes 11.6 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mazda CX-5 is clearly faster – reaching 195 km/h, while the Renault Kangoo tops out at 135 km/h. The difference is around 60 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Kangoo delivers a bit more torque with 270 Nm compared to 238 Nm. That’s about 32 Nm more.

CX-5

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo is marginally lighter – 1,489 kg compared to 1,629 kg. The difference is around 140 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers markedly more boot space – 950 L compared to 583 L. That’s a difference of about 367 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo offers visibly more capacity – up to 3,050 L, about 1,031 L more than the Mazda CX-5.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo carries very slightly more – 610 kg compared to 601 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Kangoo holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,700
Kangoo

Renault Kangoo

  • Engine Type : Electric, Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 278 - 285 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Ford Kuga is the sensible all‑rounder — roomy, loaded with hybrid options and family-friendly tech — while the Mazda CX‑5 plays the premium card with richer materials and more engaging steering. Choose the Kuga for practicality and efficiency, the CX‑5 if you want style, refinement and a …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Kangoo

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-5

The Mazda CX-5 blends elegant, athletic styling with a surprisingly engaging driving character, turning routine trips into small, satisfying adventures. Inside it feels thoughtfully built and comfortable, offering sensible practicality and a premium feel that punches above its price.

details
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_21 (1)
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_act_28
2022_mazda_cx-5_homura_hr_int_1

Reviews Mazda CX-5

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
Bengt
25 Jan 2026, 14:05:09

I've owned several Volvos, but I drive a Mazda now and would never switch back.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Kangoo

The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.

details
r221168p
r221165p
r221166p
r221163p
r221155p
r221162p

Reviews Renault Kangoo

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus NX
Mazda CX-5
VS
The Lexus NX stands out with its luxurious interior and advanced technology features, offering a refined driving experience that appeals to upscale buyers. In contrast, the Mazda CX-5 impresses with its sporty handling and engaging dynamics, making it a favorite among those who prioritize fun …
Mazda CX-5
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-5 and VW Tayron offer a fascinating comparison in the compact SUV segment, each catering to distinct driver preferences. The CX-5, renowned for its engaging driving dynamics and upscale interior, promises a spirited yet comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Tayron, with its robust build and …
Peugeot Partner
Renault Kangoo
VS
In a clash of practicality versus flair, the Peugeot E-Partner Socio and the Renault Kangoo showcase distinct personalities tailored for diverse needs. The Socio, renowned for its innovative approach and stylish design, offers a comfortable ride with ample tech-savvy features that appeal to urban …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium …
Mazda CX-5
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Mazda CX-5 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more spirited experience behind the wheel. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 charms with its robust safety features and Scandinavian-inspired interior, prioritizing comfort and …
Mazda CX-5
Renault Austral
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 continues to stand out with its sleek design, upscale interior, and refined driving dynamics. In contrast, the Renault Austral brings a fresh approach with its modern tech offerings and distinctive European flair, making it a formidable …
Mazda CX-5
SEAT Ateca
VS
Mazda CX-5 and SEAT Ateca go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-5
Renault Kangoo

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 39,500 £
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
Consumption L/100km
7 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
157 - 168 g/km
co2
0 - 168 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
56 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,629 - 1,671 kg
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
Trunk capacity
466 - 583 L
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
Length
4,690 mm
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
Height
1,695 mm
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,019 L
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
Payload
601 kg
Payload
459 - 610 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
141 HP
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 10.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
Max Speed
195 km/h
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
Torque
238 Nm
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
104 kW
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
Is the Mazda CX-5 offered with different drivetrains?

The Mazda CX-5 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.