Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Omoda 9 comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 537 HP), boot space and price (43,700 £ vs 45,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-60 or Omoda 9?
Mazda CX-60 vs Omoda 9: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mazda CX-60 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 43,700 £ , while the Omoda 9 costs 45,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,671 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 9 uses 1.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Omoda 9 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 145 km, about 82 km more than the Mazda CX-60.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 9 offers visibly more power – delivering 537 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 210 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 9 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.8 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 9 delivers moderately more torque with 650 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
CX-60
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-60 is noticeably lighter – 1,890 kg compared to 2,270 kg. The difference is around 380 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers somewhat more boot space – 570 L compared to 471 L. That’s a difference of about 99 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries clearly more – 612 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 165 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Omoda 9 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
£45,342
Omoda 9
Mazda CX-60
Omoda 9
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Omoda 9
The Omoda 9 blends bold, contemporary styling with a surprisingly spacious and well-appointed interior that punches above its class. It offers a composed, comfortable ride and modern infotainment and safety features that make it a strong choice for buyers wanting a practical yet stylish family crossover.
details
Mazda CX-60
Omoda 9
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
Price
45,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
Electric Range
145 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
co2
38 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
Curb weight
2,270 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
471 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
447 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
537 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
395 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Omoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.