Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-60 vs Skoda Octavia Combi – Which one offers the better deal?
Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-60 or Skoda Octavia Combi?
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Octavia Combi has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24400 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 17485 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.40 L. The difference is about 3 L per 100 km.
Octavia Combi
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a a bit edge – offering 327 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Skoda Octavia Combi takes 6.50 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Octavia Combi performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mazda CX-60 tops out at 219 km/h. The difference is around 31 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls distinct stronger with 550 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 180 Nm difference.
CX-60
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is clearly perceptible lighter – 1366 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 524 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers somewhat more room – 640 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs slight better – up to 1726 L, which is about 26 L more than the Skoda Octavia Combi.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 a bit takes the win – 612 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Mazda CX-60 shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £41,900
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is the sensible family wagon that somehow turns grocery runs and long trips into a pleasant, unshowy experience — spacious, practical and built like it prefers reliability over flash. With smart touches, clever storage and a cabin that feels grown-up rather than frugal, it’s an easy recommendation for buyers who want maximum utility without sacrificing comfort or style.
details
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Octavia Combi
|
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
|
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41900 - 56800 £
|
Price
24400 - 42300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
64 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
31 - 139 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
|
Curb weight
1366 - 1553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
4745 mm
|
Length
4698 - 4709 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1829 mm
|
|
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
|
Height
1455 - 1468 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1700 L
|
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Payload
471 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.5 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
203 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?
The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.