@ Mazda Motor Corporation
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Volvo V60 – Which car suits you better?

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-60 or Volvo V60?

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Introduction: A Clash of Titans in the Automotive Arena

In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, the demand for versatile and efficient vehicles has never been higher. As families and urban dwellers seek the perfect blend of style, technology, and performance, the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo V60 stand out as two formidable options. This article delves into a comprehensive comparison of these two vehicles, examining their technical specifications, innovations, and overall driving experience.

V60 @ Volvo Cars

Body Type: Utility vs. Elegance

The Mazda CX-60 is categorized as an SUV, bringing together a robust stance with generous cargo space and off-road capabilities. With a trunk capacity of 570 liters and ample interior space for five passengers, it caters to families and adventurers alike.

In contrast, the Volvo V60 is a stylish wagon that emphasizes elegance without compromising practicality. It offers a slightly smaller trunk space of 519 liters but brings with it a sleek design that appeals to those prioritizing aesthetics and comfort.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Performance: Power Under the Hood

When it comes to engine options, the Mazda CX-60 showcases a diverse lineup, including Plugin Hybrid and Diesel MHEV variants. The most powerful iteration boasts 327 HP, allowing it to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in just 5.8 seconds. Its drivetrain options include both all-wheel drive and rear-wheel drive configurations, making it suitable for various driving conditions.

On the other hand, the Volvo V60 presents a range of engines from petrol and hybrid to diesel variants, with the top-tier engine reaching an impressive 455 HP. The acceleration figures are equally remarkable, with some models sprinting from 0 to 100 km/h in just 4.6 seconds. However, it’s worth noting that the V60's maximum speed is capped at 180 km/h, a limitation uncharacteristic of its CX-60 rival.

V60 @ Volvo Cars

Fuel Efficiency: Innovation Meets Economy

Both models strive for efficiency, but they adopt different approaches. The Mazda CX-60 excels with its Plugin Hybrid variant, achieving an impressive consumption rate of just 1.4 L/100km and an electric range of 64 km. This makes it one of the most fuel-efficient options in its class.

The Volvo V60, while also providing a Plugin Hybrid option, features a higher consumption rate of 0.7 L/100km for its hybrid variant and a more substantial electric range of 92 km, thanks largely to its 14.7 kWh battery capacity. This difference highlights Volvo's commitment to greener technologies.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Technology and Innovations: The Digital Age of Driving

When it comes to in-car technology, both Mazda and Volvo have invested heavily in new innovations. The CX-60 is equipped with Mazda’s latest infotainment system, featuring a large touchscreen display that supports both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, ensuring seamless connectivity for the modern driver.

The V60, known for its advanced safety features and driver-assist technologies, comes with Volvo's renowned Pilot Assist system, which enhances safety and convenience through adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance. The intuitive user interface, along with a premium sound system, adds to the overall luxurious feel of the vehicle.

V60 @ Volvo Cars

Interior Comfort: Craftsmanship and Design

Inside the Mazda CX-60, drivers and passengers are treated to a spacious cabin featuring high-quality materials and ergonomic seating. The SUV’s elevated design allows for an expansive view of the road, complemented by an array of cargo space options making it ideal for road trips or day-to-day commutes.

The Volvo V60, on the other hand, embodies Scandinavian design principles, blending simplicity and elegance. With a focus on comfort and minimalism, the interior is adorned with high-end materials and customizable ambient lighting, ensuring a soothing driving environment.

CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Sustainability: A Commitment to the Future

Both manufacturers are making strides towards sustainability. Mazda is gradually transitioning to more eco-friendly models, with the CX-60 sitting at the forefront of their hybrid technology. The reduced CO2 emissions are significant, making it an appealing choice for environmentally conscious consumers.

Volvo, in its quest to become a fully electric brand by 2030, has integrated sustainability throughout its production process. Their vehicles, including the V60, utilize recyclable materials and advanced technologies to minimize environmental impact, demonstrating a strong commitment to a greener future.

V60 @ Volvo Cars

Conclusion: Which One Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the decision between the Mazda CX-60 and Volvo V60 boils down to personal preferences and driving needs. If you seek a powerful and efficient SUV with innovative technology and ample cargo space, the CX-60 is difficult to ignore. Conversely, if a refined, performance-oriented wagon with cutting-edge safety features is what you desire, the V60 is a compelling choice. Both vehicles stand as excellent representatives of their respective brands, catering to different aspects of the modern driver’s needs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo V60 has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41600 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 41900 £. That’s a price difference of around 257 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Volvo V60 with 2.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Volvo V60 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 92 km, about 28 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mazda CX-60 takes 5.80 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs to a small extent better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo V60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo V60 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo V60 is barely noticeable lighter – 1734 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 156 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers minimal more room – 570 L compared to 519 L. That’s a difference of about 51 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs slightly better – up to 1726 L, which is about 295 L more than the Volvo V60.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 to a small extent takes the win – 612 kg compared to 506 kg. That’s a difference of about 106 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-60 shows itself to be leaves the rival little chance and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Mazda CX-60
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £41,900
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.

details
228902_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue @ Volvo Cars
228900_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue @ Volvo Cars
228898_New_Volvo_V60_D4_Inscription_Denim_Blue @ Volvo Cars
247770_Volvo_V60_T8_Test_Drive_in_Lule_Sweden @ Volvo Cars
223558_New_Volvo_V60_exterior @ Volvo Cars

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and …
Mazda CX-60
Volvo V60
CX-60 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
V60 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
41600 - 64200 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 6.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
92 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
54 - 140 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
60 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1734 - 2064 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4778 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1850 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1432 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1431 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
466 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, …
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Tucson
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Mazda CX-60 emerge as standout options, each offering a unique blend of style and performance. While the Tucson boasts a spacious interior and advanced technology features, the CX-60 impresses with its premium materials and engaging …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V60
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the ongoing battle of luxury and practicality, the Volvo V60 and Volvo XC60 stand as captivating contenders. The V60, a sleek station wagon, offers a refined driving experience with impressive fuel efficiency and an interior designed for comfort. In contrast, the XC60, a compact SUV, boasts a …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …
@ Audi AG
Audi A5 Avant
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V60
VS
The Audi A5 Avant and Volvo V60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-60
VS
When comparing the CUPRA Terramar and the Mazda CX-60, enthusiasts will find a compelling battle between sporty performance and refined practicality. The Terramar stands out with its aggressive design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who crave adrenaline on the road. In contrast, …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V60
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the latest showdown between Volvo's stylish offerings, the V60 and the XC40, each vehicle brings a distinct set of attributes to the table. The V60, with its sleek wagon design, caters to those seeking a spacious and comfortable ride without compromising on elegant aesthetics, perfect for long …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW 3 Series Touring
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo V60
VS
In the competitive realm of premium wagons, the BMW 3 Series Touring and Volvo V60 both stand out for their distinctive blend of performance and practicality. The 3 Series Touring boasts BMW's dynamic handling and sporty aesthetics, appealing to those who crave an engaging driving experience. …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.

do not click