Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda MX-30 vs Nissan Leaf - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (170 HP vs 217 HP), boot space and price (30800 £ vs 30800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Nissan Leaf?
MX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan Leaf has a hardly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30800 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 77 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Nissan Leaf: with 16.70 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Mazda MX-30 with 18.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Nissan Leaf performs convincingly better – achieving up to 385 km, about 300 km more than the Mazda MX-30.
Leaf
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Leaf has a noticeable edge – offering 217 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Leaf is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 6.90 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.10 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Nissan Leaf performs somewhat better – reaching 157 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 17 km/h.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
MX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Nissan Leaf is a bit lighter – 1580 kg compared to 1849 kg. The difference is around 269 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Leaf offers a bit more room – 394 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda MX-30 performs distinct better – up to 1155 L, which is about 365 L more than the Nissan Leaf.
When it comes to payload, Nissan Leaf slight takes the win – 415 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Nissan Leaf holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda MX-30
Nissan Leaf
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £30,800
Nissan Leaf
Mazda MX-30
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
details
Nissan Leaf
The Nissan Leaf is a practical, easygoing electric hatch that turns daily commutes into a quiet, effortless affair while offering more cabin space than it lets on. It’s a sensible, wallet-friendly step into electrification for buyers who value comfort and simplicity over sporty drama, though those chasing long-distance thrills might look elsewhere.
details
Mazda MX-30
Nissan Leaf
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30800 - 37100 £
|
Price
30800 - 37200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.30 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
Electric Range
270 - 385 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
39 - 59 kWh
|
|
co2
22 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1849 kg
|
Curb weight
1580 - 1756 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
Trunk capacity
385 - 394 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
4490 mm
|
|
Width
1848 mm
|
Width
1788 mm
|
|
Height
1555 mm
|
Height
1540 - 1545 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1137 - 1155 L
|
Max trunk capacity
790 L
|
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Payload
384 - 415 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 217 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.10 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.9 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
Max Speed
144 - 157 km/h
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
320 - 340 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2019
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Nissan
|
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.