VS

Mazda MX-30 vs smart #3 comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or smart #3?

Mazda MX-30 vs smart #3: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
details

smart #3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mazda MX-30 is clearly cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the smart #3 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,143 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the smart #3 is slightly more efficient: consuming 16.3 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the smart #3 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 370 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

#3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is marginally lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 39 kg.

Looking at boot space, the smart #3 offers very slightly more boot space – 370 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.

When it comes to payload, the smart #3 carries somewhat more – 450 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The smart #3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£41,991
#3

smart #3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 455 km
details

Frequently compared as well

smart #3
Volvo EX30
VS
The smart #3 and Volvo EX30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
smart #3
smart #5
VS
The smart #3 and smart #5 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda MX-30
smart #3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres

Reviews Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

smart #3

The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.

details
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-exterior-mallorca1
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-exterior-mallorca13
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-exterior-mallorca21
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-interior-mallorca10
smart-hashtag3-brabus-photon-orange-interior-mallorca3
smart-hashtag3-premium-ceramic-cream-interior-mallorca7

Reviews smart #3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ronny
16 Oct 2025, 13:10:59

Handsome design, packed with advanced driver‑assist technology and stellar performance — all at an attractive price. Highly recommended, this car!

Frequently compared as well

smart #1
smart #3
VS
smart #1 and smart #3 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mercedes EQA
smart #3
VS
In the growing electric vehicle market, the Mercedes EQA and smart #3 present two distinct approaches to urban mobility. The EQA offers luxury and performance, catering to drivers seeking sophisticated features and an upscale driving experience, while the smart #3 focuses on compact design and …
smart #3
ZEEKR X
VS
Choosing between the smart #3 and the Zeekr X means weighing two compact electric crossovers that both promise style and tech, but deliver different strengths in range, interior space and driving feel. This side-by-side will help you focus on the real-world differences that matter for city …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda MX-30
VS
In the rapidly evolving world of crossover SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 and the Mazda MX-30 represent distinct approaches to modern driving needs, each with its unique charm. The CX-30 captivates with its robust yet refined design supported by a traditional internal combustion engine, focusing on …
Dacia Spring
Mazda MX-30
VS
The Dacia Spring and Mazda MX-30 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia EV3
smart #3
VS
The Kia EV3 and smart #3 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
smart #3
Volvo EX40
VS
Unsure whether the smart #3 or the Volvo EX40 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mercedes T Class
smart #3
VS
Mercedes T Class and smart #3 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda MX-30
smart #3

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
42,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
455 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
1,810 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
370 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,844 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
450 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
384 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
200 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
smart
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.