VS

Mercedes EQA vs MG MGS5 EV comparison

Compare performance (292 HP vs 231 HP), boot space and price (44,200 £ vs 32,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or MG MGS5 EV?

Mercedes EQA vs MG MGS5 EV: Key differences

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h

MG MGS5 EV

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • moderately lighter
  • visibly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG MGS5 EV is clearly cheaper – starting at 32,600 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 44,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,675 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQA is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.4 kWh/100km compared to 15.5 kWh/100km for the MG MGS5 EV. That’s a difference of about 1.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA offers moderately more range – reaching up to 561 km, about 81 km more than the MG MGS5 EV.

MGS5 EV

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA offers clearly more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 231 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the MG MGS5 EV takes 6.3 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQA delivers visibly more torque with 520 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 170 Nm more.

EQA

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG MGS5 EV is moderately lighter – 1,710 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 335 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MG MGS5 EV offers visibly more boot space – 453 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 113 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQA carries marginally more – 425 kg compared to 395 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQA holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £44,200
EQA

Mercedes EQA

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 292 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.4 - 16.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 476 - 561 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
MG MG4
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The MG4 is a zippy compact EV that fizzes through town with sharp handling, clever packaging and an attractive price — perfect if you want fun, efficiency and a bit of character in your daily commute. By contrast the MG MGS5 EV trades some of that cheeky agility for a taller, more spacious and …
Mercedes EQA
MG MGS5 EV

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MG MGS5 EV

The MG5 EV stands out as one of the few fully electric estate cars available in today's market. Known for its practicality, it offers ample space and a smooth driving experience, perfect for families looking to transition to an electric vehicle without compromising on roominess or comfort. Its sleek design and competitive pricing make it an attractive choice for eco-conscious drivers who value both style and sustainability.

details
Right-front-45-degrees
45-degrees-at-the-rear-of-the-car
Steering-wheel
trunk5

Reviews MG MGS5 EV

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
David Jenkins
2 Feb 2026, 20:44:49

MG Brand clearly not as it once was, Chinese owned swamping the SUV market with cheap affordable SUV's, but low reliability rating (2025)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
R L
31 Oct 2025, 13:46:08

We have recently moved from an ID3 to and MGS5. For me, the S5 feels a decent upgrade. The build quality really surprised me, especially in the cabin. the drive is also reassuringly solid, and in my opinion better than the ID3. the MGS5 is slightly quicker, but not too much that it is noticeable, and also more practical due to it's size.
Gone are my days of thinking MG was now just a cheap Chinese alternative. Go and test drive one, you'll see!

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The Kia EV3 arrives as the neat, well-engineered contender with a refined cabin, composed ride and range that actually matches daily needs, whereas the MG MGS5 EV trades a bit of polish for headline-grabbing value and surprisingly generous tech for the money. If you want a sure-footed, long-run …
BYD Atto 2
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The BYD Atto 2 feels like a techy, upmarket compact SUV — polished cabin, clever range and quirky styling that turns heads, making it the pick if you want EV swagger and gadgets. The MG MGS5 EV answers with straightforward practicality and a friendlier price tag, trading a bit of polish for roomy …
MG MG5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
If you want a practical, wallet-friendly electric estate, the MG5 delivers class-leading boot space, sensible range and no-nonsense value for everyday life; the MG S5 EV, by contrast, leans into SUV styling, sharper tech and a bit more punch when the lights go green. Choose the MG5 for honest, …
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG MGS5 EV is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
MG MGS5 EV
Kia EV5
VS
The MG MGS5 EV and Kia EV5 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …
BMW iX2
Mercedes EQA
VS
In the growing segment of electric compact SUVs, the BMW iX2 and Mercedes EQA stand out with their distinct charms and performance capabilities. The iX2 impresses with its sporty handling and innovative tech features, while the EQA offers a more luxurious and refined driving experience. Ultimately, …
BMW iX1
Mercedes EQA
VS
The BMW iX1 is the feisty compact EV that still drives like a BMW, with sharper handling and a practical cabin, while the Mercedes EQA prefers to charm you with a softer ride and a more polished, luxe interior. Choose the iX1 for driver engagement and better value, or the EQA if you want plush …
Mercedes EQA
MG MGS5 EV

Costs and Consumption
Price
44,200 - 57,400 £
Price
32,600 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
Electric Range
340 - 480 km
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,115 kg
Curb weight
1,710 - 1,800 kg
Trunk capacity
340 L
Trunk capacity
453 L
Length
4,463 mm
Length
-
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,849 mm
Height
1,608 - 1,613 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,320 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
370 - 395 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
Power HP
170 - 231 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 8 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
Torque
250 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
Power kW
125 - 170 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
MG
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.