VS

BYD Atto 3 vs MG MGS5 EV comparison

Compare performance (449 HP vs 231 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 32,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or MG MGS5 EV?

BYD Atto 3 vs MG MGS5 EV: Key differences

BYD Atto 3

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • marginally more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

MG MGS5 EV

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Atto 3

BYD Atto 3 VS MG MGS5 EV — two compact EVs, two clear personalities

BYD Atto 3 and MG MGS5 EV sit in the same compact electric‑SUV bracket but take opposite approaches to what matters most to buyers. The Atto 3 pushes comfort, an expressive interior and a techy, feature‑rich cabin, while the MGS5 EV emphasises quietness, rear‑seat space and pragmatic efficiency. That core difference—character and creature comforts versus calm, usable packaging—shapes how each car behaves day to day. Read on to see which traits matter for your routine and where the trade‑offs fall.

MGS5 EV

Comfort and cabin feel: soft boutique versus hushed pragmatism

Inside the BYD Atto 3 you notice personality: a rotatable centre screen, soft surfaces and a suspension tuned toward a plush, living‑room feel that makes city driving easy. The MG MGS5 EV is more restrained, offering a quieter cabin and an interior that prioritises space and composure over stylistic flourishes. In town the Atto 3’s lighter steering and cushioned ride feel effortless, whereas the MGS5 EV’s firmer setup communicates more precision but transmits sharper impacts on imperfect surfaces. If you want a cosy, characterful cockpit the Atto 3 wins on feel; if you value low noise and a steady long‑distance ambience the MGS5 EV is the calmer choice.

Atto 3

Practicality and everyday usability: design detail vs. rear‑seat real estate

Practical differences are where daily life exposes trade‑offs: the MG MGS5 EV delivers genuinely roomy rear seats and a straightforward layout that makes fitting child seats and loading family kit easy. The BYD Atto 3 is clever and well equipped, with helpful aids like a 360° camera and a user‑friendly driving position, but some rear‑seat ergonomics and cargo fixings feel more design‑led than workaday. The MG’s packaging handles bulkier items better despite a higher lip that can complicate heavy loading, while the Atto 3’s quirky cabin details make smaller errands more pleasant. Families who prioritise flexible space tend to prefer the MG; buyers who value convenience features and a distinctive interior will lean to the BYD.

MGS5 EV

Driving dynamics and long‑distance behaviour: relaxed city cruiser vs. efficient motorway companion

On the move the BYD Atto 3 behaves like a city‑first car — comfortable and composed at moderate speeds, but more aware of wind and body motion when the pace increases. The MG MGS5 EV feels more at home on longer stretches: low cabin noise and efficient energy use reduce fatigue and make steady cruising less intrusive. For regular motorway runs the MG’s quieter, more frugal nature and steadier charging behaviour generally produce less stress; the Atto 3 rewards short‑to‑medium trips and drivers who prioritise a soft ride and urban comfort. Neither car chases sportscar dynamics: BYD sacrifices steering feedback for comfort, MG exchanges a bit of urban suppleness for stability and a planted feel.

Atto 3

Technology, infotainment and driver aids: flash versus functional

BYD leans into on‑board theatre with a large, responsive rotating display and frequent over‑the‑air improvements, but some functions like climate control live deep inside menus that frustrate daily use. The MG MGS5 EV adopts a simpler, more conservative tech approach—its system can feel sluggish and shows translation rough edges, yet it’s generally less fiddly to operate when you just want straightforward controls. Both cars offer strong safety kit and solid crash ratings, but their driver‑assist personalities differ: BYD supplies a broad set of features that can feel assertive, while MG’s aids are steady but in some cases inconsistent. Ownership considerations diverge too: BYD’s software cadence and feature updates appeal to gadget‑minded buyers, whereas MG pairs its pragmatic tech with a long warranty that reduces ownership anxiety.

MGS5 EV

Buyer fit and trade‑offs: who the Atto 3 and MGS5 EV suit best

Choose the BYD Atto 3 if your life is urban or mixed‑use and you prize cushioned comfort, distinctive interior design and a rich feature list that makes short trips and school runs pleasant. Pick the MG MGS5 EV if rear‑seat space, quiet long‑distance cruising, low running costs and a value‑focused ownership package are higher on your checklist. Both work as family cars, but the Atto 3 favours creature comforts and in‑car tech, while the MGS5 EV favours usability, efficiency and a calmer cabin at speed. Below this editorial comparison we lay out the technical details—charging behaviour, power delivery and realistic range—so you can match the qualitative fit to the numbers for your use case.

Frequently compared as well

MG MGS5 EV
MG MGS6 EV
VS
Deciding between the MG MGS5 EV and the MG MGS6 EV comes down to whether you prioritize city-friendly efficiency and affordability or extra cabin space and comfort with more features. I’ll walk you through the real-world differences in range, practicality, performance and value so you can pick the …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Atto 2
VS
Choosing between the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Atto 2 comes down to whether you need more range, space and performance or a smaller, more affordable city EV. The Atto 3 delivers stronger power, longer driving range and more interior room, while the Atto 2 focuses on compact dimensions, efficiency and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Atto 3

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG MGS5 EV is a bit cheaper – starting at 32,600 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,000 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MG MGS5 EV is very slightly more efficient: consuming 15.5 kWh/100km compared to 16.4 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 0.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the BYD Atto 3 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 30 km more than the MG MGS5 EV.

MGS5 EV

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers significantly more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 231 HP. That’s roughly 218 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the MG MGS5 EV takes 6.3 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BYD Atto 3 delivers clearly more torque with 560 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.

Atto 3

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG MGS5 EV is marginally lighter – 1,710 kg compared to 1,880 kg. The difference is around 170 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BYD Atto 3 offers only slightly more boot space – 490 L compared to 453 L. That’s a difference of about 37 L.

When it comes to payload, the BYD Atto 3 carries markedly more – 530 kg compared to 395 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The BYD Atto 3 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,600
Atto 3

BYD Atto 3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 313 - 449 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 470 - 510 km
details
BYD Atto 3
MG MGS5 EV

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BYD Atto 3

The BYD Atto 3 is an electric crossover that blends a distinctive, modern design with a comfortable, well-equipped cabin suited to everyday family use. It offers a relaxed, smooth driving feel and practical running costs, making it a sensible choice if you want an uncomplicated, value-focused EV.

details
5F27650C-A457-4BA8-ABBF-B0A381081F50
4CD0D607-8DF0-480E-92A0-FFE2DD0C2A7D
A4BCEC5F-F54A-4C81-8C3B-2C7767DF6D72
E96AFF07-FF39-4455-88FE-E60F4D607FE6
AD877C78-5875-44DA-B1B6-1E99A05AC058

Reviews BYD Atto 3

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
BERNARD
17 Apr 2026, 12:36:55

It seems to better meet my expectations when it comes to fuel economy and overall efficiency.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG MGS5 EV

The MG5 EV stands out as one of the few fully electric estate cars available in today's market. Known for its practicality, it offers ample space and a smooth driving experience, perfect for families looking to transition to an electric vehicle without compromising on roominess or comfort. Its sleek design and competitive pricing make it an attractive choice for eco-conscious drivers who value both style and sustainability.

details
Right-front-45-degrees
45-degrees-at-the-rear-of-the-car
Steering-wheel
trunk5

Reviews MG MGS5 EV

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
David Jenkins
2 Feb 2026, 20:44:49

MG Brand clearly not as it once was, Chinese owned swamping the SUV market with cheap affordable SUV's, but low reliability rating (2025)

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
R L
31 Oct 2025, 13:46:08

We have recently moved from an ID3 to and MGS5. For me, the S5 feels a decent upgrade. The build quality really surprised me, especially in the cabin. the drive is also reassuringly solid, and in my opinion better than the ID3. the MGS5 is slightly quicker, but not too much that it is noticeable, and also more practical due to it's size.
Gone are my days of thinking MG was now just a cheap Chinese alternative. Go and test drive one, you'll see!

Frequently compared as well

MG MGS5 EV
MG MG4 Urban
VS
Comparing the MG5 EV and the MG4 Urban highlights two different approaches to affordable electrification: the MG5 EV is a practical, estate-style electric focused on cargo space and value, while the MG4 Urban is a compact, more dynamic hatchback with sharper handling and a modern interior. Choose …
MG MG4
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The MG4 is a zippy compact EV that fizzes through town with sharp handling, clever packaging and an attractive price — perfect if you want fun, efficiency and a bit of character in your daily commute. By contrast the MG MGS5 EV trades some of that cheeky agility for a taller, more spacious and …
BYD Atto 3
Ford Explorer EV
VS
The BYD Atto 3 and Ford Explorer EV represent two different takes on the electric SUV — the Atto 3 is a compact, value-packed package while the Explorer EV aims at larger families with more range and performance. I’ll walk you through their real-world range, practicality, driving character and …
BYD Atto 3
BYD Seal U
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and BYD Seal U shows two distinct approaches: the Atto 3 is a compact, comfort-oriented electric crossover focused on practicality and value, while the Seal U is a sleeker, performance-oriented fastback with sharper handling and longer-range options. This comparison …
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the Skoda Elroq brings together a tech-forward Chinese electric crossover and a more traditionally engineered European compact SUV. I’ll highlight the key differences in driving range, interior space, features and running costs so you can quickly see which one fits your …
Kia EV3
MG MGS5 EV
VS
The Kia EV3 arrives as the neat, well-engineered contender with a refined cabin, composed ride and range that actually matches daily needs, whereas the MG MGS5 EV trades a bit of polish for headline-grabbing value and surprisingly generous tech for the money. If you want a sure-footed, long-run …
BYD Atto 3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the BYD Atto 3 and the Toyota C‑HR pits an all-electric, tech-focused compact against Toyota’s familiar crossover offering, so it’s really a choice between EV practicality and proven petrol/hybrid versatility. Think about daily range and charging convenience if you lean toward the Atto 3, …
MG HS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Think of the MG HS (and its EHS plug‑in hybrid) as the sensible, budget‑friendly family SUV — roomy, comfortable and annoyingly practical — while the MG MGS5 EV flips the script with instant electric torque, sharper handling and far more tech for your money. Pick the HS/EHS if you want proven value …
BYD Atto 3
MG MGS5 EV

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,600 - 43,700 £
Price
32,600 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.4 - 17.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
470 - 510 km
Electric Range
340 - 480 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,880 - 1,990 kg
Curb weight
1,710 - 1,800 kg
Trunk capacity
490 L
Trunk capacity
453 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,875 mm
Width
1,849 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
530 kg
Payload
370 - 395 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
313 - 449 HP
Power HP
170 - 231 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 5.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 560 Nm
Torque
250 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
230 - 330 kW
Power kW
125 - 170 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BYD
Brand
MG
Is the BYD Atto 3 offered with different drivetrains?

The BYD Atto 3 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.