Compare performance (449 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Skoda Elroq?
In the burgeoning world of electric vehicles, the BYD Atto 3 and Skoda Elroq stand out as compelling options for those seeking an electric SUV. Both vehicles boast impressive specifications, cutting-edge technologies, and a focus on sustainability. This article delves into how these two models stack up against each other in key areas such as performance, space, and technological innovations.
The BYD Atto 3 is powered by a 150 kW electric motor, translating to 204 HP, coupled with a front-wheel drive layout. With an acceleration time of 0-100 km/h in just 7.3 seconds, it offers decent performance suited for both city driving and highway travels. The Atto 3 achieves a maximum speed of 160 km/h, which is competitive within its class.
On the other hand, the Skoda Elroq presents a more diverse powertrain lineup with choices ranging from a 125 kW (170 HP) motor to a more robust 210 kW (285 HP) variant. The Elroq also boasts superior torque figures, especially with the higher-powered option generating 545 Nm. Although its entry-level model accelerates from 0-100 km/h in 9 seconds, the sportier version cuts that time to a swift 6.6 seconds, demonstrating impressive agility that rivals some performance-oriented EVs.
When considering electric efficiency, the BYD Atto 3 is quite commendable with an energy consumption figure of just 16 kWh/100 km and an electric range of 420 km. This efficient design makes it a practical choice for urban and suburban drivers, ensuring fewer trips to the charging station.
The Skoda Elroq, however, offers more options in terms of battery capacity, with choices between 52 kWh and 77 kWh. The range can extend from 375 km for the lower capacity model up to an impressive 580 km for the larger one. Skoda’s commitment to efficiency is apparent, as the vehicle achieves consumption rates as low as 15.2 kWh/100 km on its best-performing variants.
In terms of size, the BYD Atto 3 measures 4455 mm in length, 1875 mm in width, and 1615 mm in height, offering a generous trunk capacity of 440 liters. This space makes it ideal for families or those needing extra room for gear and luggage.
The Skoda Elroq is slightly larger at 4488 mm in length and 1884 mm in width, alongside a height of 1625 mm. Notably, it features a larger trunk with a capacity of 470 liters. This additional space can be a crucial factor for buyers who prioritize cargo utility.
Both vehicles feature advanced technological integrations that enhance the driving experience. The BYD Atto 3 comes equipped with a modern infotainment system that includes a large touchscreen interface, smartphone connectivity, and various safety features that have become standard in newer EVs.
The Skoda Elroq elevates the technological game with its innovative driver-assistance systems, high-definition displays, and options for enhanced connectivity features that communicate with smart devices. Skoda integrates advanced features that allow for over-the-air updates, ensuring that the vehicle remains up-to-date with the latest software improvements.
The BYD Atto 3 and Skoda Elroq present two appealing options in the electric SUV market, each with distinct advantages. The Atto 3 is a solid choice for drivers seeking efficiency and practicality without compromising on performance. In contrast, the Elroq provides a broader range of options, exceptional torque, and state-of-the-art technology for a superior driving experience.
As consumer preferences continue to evolve, both vehicles underscore the exciting direction of electric mobility, catering to diverse needs and preferences in the automotive landscape.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
BYD Atto 3 is somewhat cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Skoda Elroq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,448 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Elroq is very slightly more efficient: consuming 15.2 kWh/100km compared to 16 kWh/100km for the BYD Atto 3. That’s a difference of about 0.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 573 km, about 63 km more than the BYD Atto 3.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 449 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Skoda Elroq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Elroq is slightly faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Elroq delivers moderately more torque with 679 Nm compared to 560 Nm. That’s about 119 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is a bit lighter – 1,825 kg compared to 2,133 kg. The difference is around 308 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers only slightly more boot space – 470 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Elroq offers a bit more capacity – up to 1,580 L, about 242 L more than the BYD Atto 3.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Elroq carries markedly more – 517 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 182 kg.
The BYD Atto 3 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 43,700 £
|
Price
37,900 - 45,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
420 - 510 km
|
Electric Range
529 - 573 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
77 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,825 kg
|
Curb weight
2,133 - 2,268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
4,455 mm
|
Length
4,488 mm
|
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
Width
1,884 mm
|
|
Height
1,615 mm
|
Height
1,608 - 1,625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,338 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,580 L
|
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Payload
470 - 517 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 449 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 - 560 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 330 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España