Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BYD Atto 3 vs Skoda Elroq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (204 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (33400 £ vs 29100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BYD Atto 3 or Skoda Elroq?
Atto 3
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Elroq has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £ , while the BYD Atto 3 costs 33400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4363 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Elroq: with 15.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the BYD Atto 3 with 16 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Skoda Elroq performs distinct better – achieving up to 573 km, about 153 km more than the BYD Atto 3.
Elroq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Elroq has a noticeable edge – offering 340 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Elroq is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the BYD Atto 3 takes 7.30 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Skoda Elroq performs somewhat better – reaching 180 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Elroq pulls convincingly stronger with 679 Nm compared to 310 Nm. That’s about 369 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Atto 3
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, BYD Atto 3 is hardly perceptible lighter – 1825 kg compared to 1953 kg. The difference is around 128 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Elroq offers slight more room – 470 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Elroq performs to a small extent better – up to 1580 L, which is about 242 L more than the BYD Atto 3.
When it comes to payload, Skoda Elroq distinct takes the win – 531 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 196 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Elroq proves to be dominates this comparison and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Elroq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £29,100
Skoda Elroq
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Elroq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
BYD Atto 3
5 (1 Reviews)
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
Skoda Elroq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Elroq is a cleverly packaged family SUV that mixes roomy practicality with sharp, modern looks, making it an easy pick for buyers who prefer common sense over flash. On the road it's composed and user-friendly, with thoughtful interior details that turn everyday driving into something pleasantly efficient — a sensible companion with a wink.
details
BYD Atto 3
Skoda Elroq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33400 - 35100 £
|
Price
29100 - 45500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 16.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
420 km
|
Electric Range
377 - 573 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1953 - 2268 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
470 L
|
|
Length
4455 mm
|
Length
4488 mm
|
|
Width
1875 mm
|
Width
1884 mm
|
|
Height
1615 mm
|
Height
1608 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1338 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1580 L
|
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Payload
470 - 531 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.30 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drive types are available for the BYD Atto 3?
The BYD Atto 3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.