Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQS SUV vs Land Rover Range Rover - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (658 HP vs 615 HP), boot space and price (95000 £ vs 122700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS SUV or Land Rover Range Rover?
EQS SUV
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes EQS SUV has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 95000 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27770 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV performs clearly better – achieving up to 695 km, about 578 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV has a minimal edge – offering 658 HP compared to 615 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover takes 4.50 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover performs somewhat better – reaching 261 km/h, while the Mercedes EQS SUV tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQS SUV pulls a bit stronger with 950 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
EQS SUV
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover is hardly perceptible lighter – 2504 kg compared to 2695 kg. The difference is around 191 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers noticeable more room – 818 L compared to 645 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Land Rover Range Rover performs barely noticeable better – up to 2176 L, which is about 76 L more than the Mercedes EQS SUV.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover clearly perceptible takes the win – 846 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 276 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQS SUV is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQS SUV
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £95,000
Mercedes EQS SUV
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Mercedes EQS SUV
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
95000 - 212100 £
|
Price
122700 - 244700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
31.80 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
62 - 265 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 - 90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2695 - 3075 kg
|
Curb weight
2504 - 2810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
5125 mm
|
Length
5052 - 5258 mm
|
|
Width
1959 - 2034 mm
|
Width
2047 mm
|
|
Height
1718 - 1721 mm
|
Height
1870 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1841 - 2176 L
|
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Payload
589 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
218 - 261 km/h
|
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2997 - 4395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Mercedes EQS SUV offered with different drivetrains?
The Mercedes EQS SUV is available as All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.