Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQS SUV vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison
Compare performance (658 HP vs 550 HP), boot space and price (95,000 £ vs 125,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS SUV or Land Rover Range Rover?
Mercedes EQS SUV vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EQS SUV
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly cheaper – starting at 95,000 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 125,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 30,256 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers clearly more range – reaching up to 695 km, about 579 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover.
Range Rover
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers moderately more power – delivering 658 HP compared to 550 HP. That’s roughly 108 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS SUV delivers somewhat more torque with 950 Nm compared to 800 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
EQS SUV
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover is very slightly lighter – 2,504 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 191 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover offers clearly more boot space – 818 L compared to 645 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries markedly more – 846 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 276 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQS SUV stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £95,000
Mercedes EQS SUV
Mercedes EQS SUV
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
Land Rover Range Rover
The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.
details
Mercedes EQS SUV
Land Rover Range Rover
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
95,000 - 212,100 £
|
Price
125,200 - 275,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 11.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
Electric Range
115 - 116 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
62 - 267 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,695 - 3,075 kg
|
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
|
|
Length
5,125 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,959 - 2,034 mm
|
Width
2,047 mm
|
|
Height
1,718 - 1,721 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,100 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Payload
645 - 846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
Power HP
300 - 550 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
550 - 800 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
Power kW
221 - 405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.