VS

Ford Kuga vs Land Rover Range Rover comparison

Compare performance (243 HP vs 615 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 122,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Kuga or Land Rover Range Rover?

Ford Kuga vs Land Rover Range Rover: Key differences

Ford Kuga

4.2 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter

Land Rover Range Rover

  • substantially more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • substantially more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kuga

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Kuga is clearly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover costs 122,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 88,500 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover uses 2.7 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Ford Kuga with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Land Rover Range Rover offers substantially more range – reaching up to 117 km, about 49 km more than the Ford Kuga.

Range Rover

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover offers substantially more power – delivering 615 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 372 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover delivers considerably more torque with 800 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.

Kuga

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Land Rover Range Rover offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is clearly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 2,504 kg. The difference is around 978 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover carries noticeably more – 846 kg compared to 550 kg. That’s a difference of about 296 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £122,700
Range Rover

Land Rover Range Rover

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 300 - 615 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.7 - 11.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 116 - 117 km
Ford Kuga
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Kuga

The Kuga is Ford’s adaptable family SUV that blends usable space with a surprisingly lively driving character, making daily commutes and weekend escapes equally enjoyable. With smart interior packaging, an easy-to-use infotainment setup and composed road manners, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want a bit of fun without the fuss.

details

Land Rover Range Rover

The Range Rover wraps unabashed luxury and genuine off-road capability into a silhouette that still manages to look effortlessly elegant whether parked outside a city hotel or splashing through a muddy trail. Inside, it’s a cocoon of soft leathers, refined materials and serene ride quality that makes long journeys feel like private-jet comfort — ideal for buyers who want a plush cruiser that can also go where lesser SUVs won’t.

details
Ford Kuga
Land Rover Range Rover

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
Price
122,700 - 244,700 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.7 - 11.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
68 km
Electric Range
116 - 117 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
55 - 154 g/km
co2
62 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
Curb weight
2,504 - 2,810 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
212 - 818 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,882 mm
Width
2,047 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
541 - 550 kg
Payload
589 - 846 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
Power HP
300 - 615 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 Nm
Torque
650 - 800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
Power kW
221 - 452 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
2,997 - 4,395 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Land Rover
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.