VS

Mercedes EQS vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (585 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (80,900 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS or Suzuki Swace?

Mercedes EQS vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Mercedes EQS

  • significantly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQS

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Swace is substantially cheaper – starting at 31,900 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 80,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 49,039 £.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS offers significantly more power – delivering 585 HP compared to 140 HP. That’s roughly 445 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Suzuki Swace takes 9.4 s. That’s about 5.3 s quicker.

EQS

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is substantially lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 2,550 kg. The difference is around 1,075 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS offers barely more boot space – 610 L compared to 596 L. That’s a difference of about 14 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS carries noticeably more – 570 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 210 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQS is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £80,900
EQS

Mercedes EQS

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 367 - 585 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 810 - 920 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
The Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports are closely related compact estate cars that combine hybrid efficiency with practical, family-friendly space. This comparison focuses on how the Swace and the Corolla Touring Sports differ in styling, equipment, driving feel and running costs …
Mercedes EQS
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQS

The Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.

details
21C0401_005
21C0401_007
21C0401_010
21C0401_012
21C0400_043

Reviews Mercedes EQS

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Focus
Suzuki Swace
VS
In a showdown between the Ford Focus and the Suzuki Swace, the Focus stands out with its dynamic handling and robust engine options that cater to driving enthusiasts seeking a spirited ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki Swace offers a practical hybrid drivetrain with outstanding fuel efficiency, making it …
Mercedes EQS
Volvo ES90
VS
Mercedes EQS and Volvo ES90 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes EQS or the Volvo …
Mercedes EQE
Mercedes EQS
VS
Mercedes EQE and Mercedes EQS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes EQE or the …
Mercedes EQE SUV
Mercedes EQS
VS
In the realm of luxury electric vehicles, the battle between the Mercedes EQE SUV and the Mercedes EQS is one of intriguing contrasts. The EQE SUV, with its commanding presence and spacious design, offers an elevated driving experience ideal for those seeking versatility without compromising on …
Mercedes EQS
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Mercedes EQS and BYD Sealion 7 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes EQS or the BYD …
Mercedes EQS
Rolls-Royce Ghost
VS
Mercedes EQS and Rolls-Royce Ghost go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mercedes EQS or the …
Renault Mégane
Suzuki Swace
VS
Renault Mégane and Suzuki Swace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Renault Mégane or the …
Skoda Octavia Combi
Suzuki Swace
VS
Skoda Octavia Combi and Suzuki Swace go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Octavia …
Mercedes EQS
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
80,900 - 117,500 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
810 - 920 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,550 - 2,660 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
610 L
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,926 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
545 - 570 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
367 - 585 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
505 - 800 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
270 - 430 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Suzuki
What drive types are available for the Mercedes EQS?

The Mercedes EQS is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.