VS

Mercedes EQS vs Volvo ES90 comparison

Compare performance (544 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (93,900 £ vs 61,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS or Volvo ES90?

Mercedes EQS vs Volvo ES90: Key differences

Mercedes EQS

  • somewhat more electric range
  • markedly more trunk space

Volvo ES90

3.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Volvo ES90 is clearly cheaper – starting at 61,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 93,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,195 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo ES90 is marginally more efficient: consuming 15.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQS. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 816 km, about 116 km more than the Volvo ES90.

ES90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers somewhat more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 544 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mercedes EQS takes 4.4 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mercedes EQS is somewhat faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo ES90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers only slightly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 858 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.

EQS

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo ES90 is very slightly lighter – 2,410 kg compared to 2,545 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS offers markedly more boot space – 610 L compared to 424 L. That’s a difference of about 186 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQS offers a bit more capacity – up to 1,770 L, about 343 L more than the Volvo ES90.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS carries a bit more – 565 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo ES90 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £61,700
ES90

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 - 17.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 651 - 700 km
Mercedes EQS
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQS

The Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.

details

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
Mercedes EQS
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

Price
93,900 - 123,500 £
Price
61,700 - 81,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
790 - 816 km
Electric Range
651 - 700 km
Battery Capacity
118 kWh
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,545 - 2,655 kg
Curb weight
2,410 - 2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
610 L
Trunk capacity
424 L
Length
5,223 mm
Length
5,000 mm
Width
1,926 mm
Width
1,942 mm
Height
1,512 mm
Height
1,546 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,770 L
Max trunk capacity
1,427 L
Payload
550 - 565 kg
Payload
490 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
360 - 544 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
210 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
568 - 858 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
265 - 400 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,024
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.