Compare performance (544 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (93,900 £ vs 61,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS or Volvo ES90?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo ES90 is clearly cheaper – starting at 61,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 93,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 32,195 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo ES90 is marginally more efficient: consuming 15.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQS. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 816 km, about 116 km more than the Volvo ES90.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers somewhat more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 544 HP. That’s roughly 136 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mercedes EQS takes 4.4 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes EQS is somewhat faster – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo ES90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers only slightly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 858 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo ES90 is very slightly lighter – 2,410 kg compared to 2,545 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS offers markedly more boot space – 610 L compared to 424 L. That’s a difference of about 186 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQS offers a bit more capacity – up to 1,770 L, about 343 L more than the Volvo ES90.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS carries a bit more – 565 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 65 kg.
The Volvo ES90 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.
detailsThe Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
93,900 - 123,500 £
|
Price
61,700 - 81,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
790 - 816 km
|
Electric Range
651 - 700 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
118 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,545 - 2,655 kg
|
Curb weight
2,410 - 2,610 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
610 L
|
Trunk capacity
424 L
|
|
Length
5,223 mm
|
Length
5,000 mm
|
|
Width
1,926 mm
|
Width
1,942 mm
|
|
Height
1,512 mm
|
Height
1,546 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,770 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,427 L
|
|
Payload
550 - 565 kg
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
360 - 544 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 6.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
568 - 858 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
265 - 400 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|