Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Renault Mégane comparison
Compare performance (122 HP vs 218 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Renault Mégane?
Mercedes EQT vs Renault Mégane: Key differences
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes EQT is visibly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Renault Mégane costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,283 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Renault Mégane is visibly more efficient: consuming 15.4 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 4.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Mégane offers visibly more range – reaching up to 452 km, about 174 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Mégane
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Mégane offers significantly more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 96 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Mégane is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 5.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Renault Mégane is a bit faster – reaching 160 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 28 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Mégane delivers somewhat more torque with 300 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 55 Nm more.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Mégane is moderately lighter – 1,719 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 206 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQT offers visibly more boot space – 551 L compared to 389 L. That’s a difference of about 162 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQT offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,979 L, about 647 L more than the Renault Mégane.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries moderately more – 531 kg compared to 446 kg. That’s a difference of about 85 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Mégane is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £35,100
Renault Mégane
Mercedes EQT
Renault Mégane
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Renault Mégane
The Renault Mégane blends Gallic flair with practical everyday charm, showing that sensible transport can still have personality and poise. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want a comfortable, stylish hatchback that feels a little more special than the usual commute companion.
details
Mercedes EQT
Renault Mégane
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
Price
35,100 - 38,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
452 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
Curb weight
1,719 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
389 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
4,200 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,783 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,332 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
446 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.