Compare performance (354 HP vs 243 HP), boot space and price (43,200 £ vs 34,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes GLB or Ford Kuga?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and Mercedes GLB have carved out significant niches for themselves. Both vehicles present distinct differences and are packed with features that cater to various driving preferences and lifestyles. Let’s delve deeper into these two 2024 model year contenders and see how they stack up against each other.
The Ford Kuga’s exterior measurements include a length ranging between 4604 mm and 4645 mm, a width of 1882 mm, and a height between 1673 mm and 1681 mm. It boasts a modern look with an athletic stance, emphasizing functionality and space efficiency. On the other side, the Mercedes GLB offers a length between 4634 mm and 4650 mm, with a width up to 1850 mm and a height between 1665 mm and 1692 mm. The GLB exudes a more robust and upscale persona, often characteristic of the Mercedes-Benz brand, designed to captivate those with a taste for luxury.
The Ford Kuga provides a variety of engine options, including petrol, full hybrid, and plug-in hybrid variants. With power outputs ranging from 150 HP to 243 HP, it strikes a balance between efficiency and performance. Acceleration for the Kuga varies, with the plug-in hybrid leading at a brisk 7.3 seconds for 0-100 km/h. Meanwhile, the GLB offers a diverse range of petrol MHEV and diesel engines, with a power spectrum from 116 HP up to a powerful 320 HP. With a top acceleration of 5.5 seconds in its higher-spec iterations, the GLB delivers a punchier performance for drivers seeking a bit more thrill.
On the efficiency front, the Kuga’s plug-in hybrid impresses with a consumption rate of just 0.9 L/100km and an electric range of 69 km, tailored for eco-minded drivers. The GLB, while efficient for its segment, displays consumption numbers between 5.6 L/100km and 9 L/100km depending on the engine, staying efficient for conventional fuel options but not competing with the Kuga’s hybrid credentials.
Inside, the Ford Kuga supports a family-friendly setup with seating for five and a cargo space of 412 liters. The Mercedes GLB, however, takes a step further, allowing the same seating capacity but with a larger trunk at 570 liters, making it a more practical option for those who prioritize storage space.
Both SUVs come equipped with cutting-edge technology. The Ford Kuga integrates a suite of smart features, focusing heavily on connectivity and intuitive design aimed at enhancing driver experience. The Mercedes GLB, true to its lineage, incorporates advanced infotainment and safety systems, providing an unparalleled sense of luxury and control.
The Ford Kuga and Mercedes GLB each have their merits, with the Kuga offering versatility and hybrid efficiency while the GLB delivers a premium experience with powerful engine options and superior storage capacity. The ultimate decision may rest with brand preference, budget, and specific driving needs. Enthusiasts and potential buyers are invited to test drive these impressive SUVs to truly experience the compelling qualities each has to offer.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Kuga is visibly cheaper – starting at 34,200 £ , while the Mercedes GLB costs 43,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,955 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Kuga uses 2.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mercedes GLB with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes GLB offers significantly more range – reaching up to 631 km, about 563 km more than the Ford Kuga.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLB offers markedly more power – delivering 354 HP compared to 243 HP. That’s roughly 111 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLB is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the Ford Kuga takes 7.3 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes GLB delivers substantially more torque with 515 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 275 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Kuga is markedly lighter – 1,526 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 314 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Kuga carries barely more – 550 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
The Mercedes GLB stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes GLB is a compact luxury SUV that blends smart packaging with a polished, composed driving experience. Its flexible interior and premium feel make it a sensible pick for buyers who want Mercedes comfort and practicality in a smaller footprint.
details
The Ford Kuga is a practical and comfortable compact SUV that balances everyday usability with a composed ride and adaptable interior. It offers sensible tech and safety features, making it a solid choice for families or anyone seeking a versatile, easy-to-live-with crossover.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,200 - 62,400 £
|
Price
34,200 - 46,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
431 - 631 km
|
Electric Range
68 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 138 g/km
|
co2
55 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,840 - 2,280 kg
|
Curb weight
1,526 - 1,859 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
540 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,861 mm
|
Width
1,882 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
485 - 505 kg
|
Payload
541 - 550 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
156 - 354 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 243 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.3 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
280 - 515 Nm
|
Torque
240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
115 - 260 kW
|
Power kW
111 - 178 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,496 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España