VS

Mercedes Marco Polo vs MG MG3 comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (57,500 £ vs 15,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or MG MG3?

Mercedes Marco Polo vs MG MG3: Key differences

Mercedes Marco Polo

  • somewhat more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marco Polo

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG MG3 is substantially cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 42,065 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG MG3 uses 4.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.

MG3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers somewhat more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 194 HP. That’s roughly 43 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes Marco Polo is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the MG MG3 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Marco Polo delivers significantly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 352 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: MG MG3 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is clearly lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 1,213 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 202 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG MG3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £15,400
MG3

MG MG3

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 194 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
MG MG4
VS
If you're after cheap thrills and nimble city driving, the MG3 is the plucky choice — inexpensive, quirky and perfect for tight car parks. But for real-world practicality, range and a more modern feel, the MG4's stylish hatch and EV tech make it the smarter buy for daily drivers who want a bit of …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS …
Mercedes Marco Polo
MG MG3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes Marco Polo

The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.

details
serpimg_rTvtWU

Reviews Mercedes Marco Polo

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MG MG3

The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.

details
KV-1-1
Left-Back-30°-1
Front-Row-Space-1
Trunk-3

Reviews MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Giorgio catacchio
20 Sept 2025, 00:08:28

I've owned the MG3 Hybrid for a year — I travel a lot, never a dull moment; comes fully loaded as standard, incredible acceleration, etc.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i20
MG MG3
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Hyundai i20 stands out with its stylish design, advanced tech features, and efficient engine options, making it a strong contender for urban drivers. In contrast, the MG MG3 offers a spacious interior and impressive value for money, appealing to …
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the MG3 takes on the Renault Clio, offering an impressive mix of practicality and style for the price-conscious consumer. While the Clio boasts a more refined interior and a well-established reputation, the MG3 stands out with its generous warranty and …
Mazda 2 Hybrid
MG MG3
VS
In the competitive compact car segment, the Mazda 2 Hybrid stands out with its efficient hybrid technology and sharp handling, making it an appealing choice for eco-conscious drivers. On the other hand, the MG MG3 offers a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing essential features, …
MG MG3
Opel Corsa
VS
In the competitive hatchback segment, the MG3 and Vauxhall Corsa both offer attractive options for budget-conscious drivers. The MG3 stands out with its bold styling and surprisingly spacious interior, while the Vauxhall Corsa brings refined driving dynamics and advanced infotainment options to the …
Honda Jazz
MG MG3
VS
In the competitive world of compact hatchbacks, the Honda Jazz continues to impress with its spacious interior and reliability, providing a versatile option for city drivers. Meanwhile, the MG MG3 makes its mark with a stylish design and a budget-friendly price tag, appealing to younger drivers …
Citroen C3
MG MG3
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Citroën C3 and MG MG3 present distinct approaches to practicality and style. The C3 stands out with its distinctive design and advanced comfort features, making it a cozy option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG MG3 offers a spacious interior and a …
Dacia Sandero
MG MG3
VS
In the budget-friendly hatchback segment, the Dacia Sandero and MG MG3 offer compelling choices for cost-conscious drivers. The Dacia Sandero is renowned for its spacious interior and remarkable fuel efficiency, making it a practical choice for families. Alternatively, the MG MG3 stands out with …
Ford Puma
MG MG3
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Ford Puma and the MG MG3, both models offer unique strengths that cater to different buyer preferences. The Ford Puma impresses with its stylish design, advanced technology, and dynamic driving experience, making it a strong contender in the compact SUV segment. …
Mercedes Marco Polo
MG MG3

Costs and Consumption
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
194 - 218 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Bus
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
Trunk capacity
670 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
5,140 mm
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
1,975 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
555 - 650 kg
Payload
373 - 448 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
MG
What drive types are available for the Mercedes Marco Polo?

The Mercedes Marco Polo is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.