Compare performance (116 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 15,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 2 Hybrid or MG MG3?
The automotive market is ever-evolving, with more consumers seeking efficient, reliable, and technologically advanced vehicles. In this article, we will compare two contenders in the hatchback segment: the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the MG MG3. Both models bring unique attributes to the table, making them worthy of consideration for those contemplating a new purchase in 2024.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid is a full hybrid hatchback that elegantly balances performance and efficiency. With its modern design and advanced hybrid technology, it promises both driving pleasure and low emissions.
On the other hand, the MG3 is a compact hatchback that also features a full hybrid engine. Despite its slightly larger dimensions, the MG3 emphasizes performance and practicality, appealing to buyers who prioritize both speed and space.
When it comes to power, the Mazda 2 Hybrid is equipped with a 1.5-liter, three-cylinder engine producing a total of 116 HP (85 kW). It accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a respectable 9.7 seconds, achieving a top speed of 175 km/h. This model leverages a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) that optimizes fuel efficiency while delivering smooth acceleration.
In contrast, the MG3 boasts a more powerful 1.5-liter engine with four cylinders, generating 194 HP (143 kW). It shines in acceleration, reaching 100 km/h in just 8 seconds. Although its max speed is slightly lower at 170 km/h, the MG3's automatic gearbox provides an engaging driving experience while still being easy to handle for everyday use.
Fuel efficiency is a significant factor for many car buyers today, and here the Mazda 2 Hybrid excels with consumption figures as low as 3.8 L/100 km. Coupled with its CO2 emissions rating of just 87 g/km, it sits within the B efficiency class, making it an environmentally friendly option as well.
The MG3, while still respectable, shows slightly higher fuel consumption at 4.4 L/100 km, corresponding to CO2 emissions of 100 g/km. This places the MG3 in the C efficiency class. Though it may not be as eco-friendly as the Mazda 2, its performance capabilities are quite compelling.
Both vehicles offer a practical layout for passengers and cargo, essential for daily commuting or weekend trips. The Mazda 2 Hybrid provides a trunk capacity of 286 liters, while the MG3 slightly edges this out with 293 liters, useful for grocery runs or luggage when traveling.
In terms of interior comfort, both cars come with spacious seating arrangements for up to 5 passengers. The Mazda 2 Hybrid measures 3940 mm in length, 1745 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height. Meanwhile, the MG3 is slightly larger, measuring 4113 mm long, 1797 mm wide, and 1502 mm high, which may offer a bit more room for larger passengers or additional belongings.
Both models come equipped with modern technology to enhance the driving experience. The Mazda 2 Hybrid includes advanced safety features like adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, emphasizing driver assistance. On the tech front, you can expect a user-friendly infotainment system designed to keep you connected while on the road.
The MG3, while also featuring a robust safety suite, leans towards technology that boosts performance. It offers multiple driving modes to bolster efficiency and responsiveness, catering to both city and highway driving. Infotainment systems in the MG3 are intuitive, ensuring that connectivity isn't compromised on any journey.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and MG MG3 boils down to individual preferences and requirements. If you're looking for a fuel-efficient, eco-friendly vehicle with advanced safety features, the Mazda 2 Hybrid stands out as an excellent option.
Conversely, if you desire more power, slightly enhanced performance, and the practicality of increased trunk space, the MG3 may suit your needs better. Both models are well-rounded and cater to different segments of hatchback enthusiasts, ensuring that buyers can find a model that fits seamlessly into their lifestyle.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MG MG3 is visibly cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Mazda 2 Hybrid costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,000 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda 2 Hybrid uses 3.8 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the MG MG3 with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers considerably more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 78 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mazda 2 Hybrid takes 9.7 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda 2 Hybrid is barely lighter – 1,180 kg compared to 1,237 kg. The difference is around 57 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG MG3 carries barely more – 448 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.
The MG MG3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid brings Mazda’s trademark driving flair to the city, combining smooth, efficient running with unexpectedly eager handling that keeps short trips engaging. Compact, nicely finished and sensible on running costs, it’s a clever choice for buyers who want the economy of a small car without sacrificing cabin quality or personality.
details
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 28,200 £
|
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
87 - 93 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,180 kg
|
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
286 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,745 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España