In the competitive compact car segment, the Mazda 2 Hybrid stands out with its efficient hybrid technology and sharp handling, making it an appealing choice for eco-conscious drivers. On the other hand, the MG MG3 offers a more budget-friendly option without sacrificing essential features, appealing to those looking for value in their daily commute. Both models have their strengths, but the decision ultimately hinges on whether buyers prioritize efficiency and driving dynamics or affordability and practicality.
The automotive market is ever-evolving, with more consumers seeking efficient, reliable, and technologically advanced vehicles. In this article, we will compare two contenders in the hatchback segment: the Mazda 2 Hybrid and the MG MG3. Both models bring unique attributes to the table, making them worthy of consideration for those contemplating a new purchase in 2024.
The Mazda 2 Hybrid is a full hybrid hatchback that elegantly balances performance and efficiency. With its modern design and advanced hybrid technology, it promises both driving pleasure and low emissions.
On the other hand, the MG3 is a compact hatchback that also features a full hybrid engine. Despite its slightly larger dimensions, the MG3 emphasizes performance and practicality, appealing to buyers who prioritize both speed and space.
When it comes to power, the Mazda 2 Hybrid is equipped with a 1.5-liter, three-cylinder engine producing a total of 116 HP (85 kW). It accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in a respectable 9.7 seconds, achieving a top speed of 175 km/h. This model leverages a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) that optimizes fuel efficiency while delivering smooth acceleration.
In contrast, the MG3 boasts a more powerful 1.5-liter engine with four cylinders, generating 194 HP (143 kW). It shines in acceleration, reaching 100 km/h in just 8 seconds. Although its max speed is slightly lower at 170 km/h, the MG3's automatic gearbox provides an engaging driving experience while still being easy to handle for everyday use.
Fuel efficiency is a significant factor for many car buyers today, and here the Mazda 2 Hybrid excels with consumption figures as low as 3.8 L/100 km. Coupled with its CO2 emissions rating of just 87 g/km, it sits within the B efficiency class, making it an environmentally friendly option as well.
The MG3, while still respectable, shows slightly higher fuel consumption at 4.4 L/100 km, corresponding to CO2 emissions of 100 g/km. This places the MG3 in the C efficiency class. Though it may not be as eco-friendly as the Mazda 2, its performance capabilities are quite compelling.
Both vehicles offer a practical layout for passengers and cargo, essential for daily commuting or weekend trips. The Mazda 2 Hybrid provides a trunk capacity of 286 liters, while the MG3 slightly edges this out with 293 liters, useful for grocery runs or luggage when traveling.
In terms of interior comfort, both cars come with spacious seating arrangements for up to 5 passengers. The Mazda 2 Hybrid measures 3940 mm in length, 1745 mm in width, and 1505 mm in height. Meanwhile, the MG3 is slightly larger, measuring 4113 mm long, 1797 mm wide, and 1502 mm high, which may offer a bit more room for larger passengers or additional belongings.
Both models come equipped with modern technology to enhance the driving experience. The Mazda 2 Hybrid includes advanced safety features like adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, emphasizing driver assistance. On the tech front, you can expect a user-friendly infotainment system designed to keep you connected while on the road.
The MG3, while also featuring a robust safety suite, leans towards technology that boosts performance. It offers multiple driving modes to bolster efficiency and responsiveness, catering to both city and highway driving. Infotainment systems in the MG3 are intuitive, ensuring that connectivity isn't compromised on any journey.
Ultimately, the choice between the Mazda 2 Hybrid and MG MG3 boils down to individual preferences and requirements. If you're looking for a fuel-efficient, eco-friendly vehicle with advanced safety features, the Mazda 2 Hybrid stands out as an excellent option.
Conversely, if you desire more power, slightly enhanced performance, and the practicality of increased trunk space, the MG3 may suit your needs better. Both models are well-rounded and cater to different segments of hatchback enthusiasts, ensuring that buyers can find a model that fits seamlessly into their lifestyle.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 21400 - 28200
£
|
Price
about 15400 - 20600
£
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
87 - 93
g/km
|
co2
100 - 137
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
36
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
36
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1180
kg
|
Curb weight
1285
kg
|
Trunk capacity
286
L
|
Trunk capacity
293
L
|
Length
3940
mm
|
Length
4113
mm
|
Width
1745
mm
|
Width
1797
mm
|
Height
1505
mm
|
Height
1502
mm
|
Payload
435
kg
|
Payload
448
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Schaltgetriebe
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
116
HP
|
Power HP
116 - 194
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.7
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8
s
|
Max Speed
175
km/h
|
Max Speed
170
km/h
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
85
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 143
kW
|
Engine capacity
1490
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1490
cm3
|
Top speed
175
km/h
|
Top speed
170
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
MG
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.