Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs MG MG3 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 15400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MG MG3?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MG MG3 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9351 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG MG3 manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.
MG3
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 has a slightly edge – offering 194 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the MG MG3 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the MG MG3 tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls clearly stronger with 290 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MG MG3 is barely noticeable lighter – 1237 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 79 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers significantly more room – 523 L compared to 293 L. That’s a difference of about 230 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1283 L, which is about 300 L more than the MG MG3.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slight takes the win – 469 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
MG MG3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
MG MG3
5 (1 Reviews)
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
Ford Puma
MG MG3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
15400 - 21400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 45 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1237 - 1285 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
293 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4113 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1502 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
983 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1490 - 1495 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
MG
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.