@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
VS

Ford Puma vs MG MG3 – Differences & prices compared

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MG MG3?

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma vs MG MG3: A Clash of Titans

The automotive market continues to evolve, offering consumers a plethora of choices in their quest for the perfect vehicle. In this comparison, we delve into two intriguing contenders: the Ford Puma, an energetic SUV, and the MG MG3, a practical hatchback. While they serve different purposes, both vehicles present appealing features that cater to both performance and efficiency. Let’s explore the technical aspects and innovations that set these two models apart.

MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Engine Performance and Efficiency

Starting with the Ford Puma, it delivers a range of power options, featuring petrol engines with mild hybrid technology and even full electric variants. The Puma’s engines produce between 125 to 168 horsepower, with 0-100 km/h acceleration times ranging from a commendable 7.4 seconds to 9.8 seconds. The fuel consumption varies between 5.4 to 6 L/100km, while the electric variant operates at a consumption rate of 13.1-13.7 kWh/100km. This impressive efficiency is complemented by an electric range of up to 376 km.

On the other hand, the MG MG3 boasts a relatively straightforward engine offering a petrol unit producing 116 horsepower with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of 8 seconds. While it may not match the Puma in raw performance, the MG3 excels in fuel economy, consuming just 4.4 L/100km. For those seeking a balance between efficiency and power, the MG3 presents a compelling argument.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Transmissions and Drivability

The transmissions available in both vehicles also reflect their design ethos. The Ford Puma can be equipped with either a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission, providing drivers with a choice based on their preferences for control or convenience. Front-wheel drive is standard, ensuring a sporty feel on the road, accompanied by a range of torque outputs from 170 to 290 Nm.

The MG MG3 comes with an automatic transmission option alongside the manual gearbox, offering simplicity and ease of use. With a curb weight of 1285kg, it is lightweight compared to the Puma, which ranges from 1316 to 1563kg depending on the variant. This weight difference contributes to the MG3’s nimble handling and enhanced efficiency.

MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Size, Comfort, and Practicality

When it comes to dimensions, the Ford Puma stands out with a length of 4186 mm to 4226 mm and a trunk capacity between 456 and 523 liters, offering ample space for passengers and cargo alike. Its SUV body style and higher ride height provide an elevated driving position, appealing to those who crave a more commanding presence on the road.

In contrast, the MG MG3, while shorter at 4113 mm, still manages to provide comfortable seating for five passengers but falls short in trunk space with only 293 liters. However, its compact hatchback design makes it an excellent option for city driving and parking in tight spaces.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Innovations and Technology

Both models are equipped with modern technology, focusing on driver comfort and connectivity. The Ford Puma is packed with Ford's latest infotainment systems, including smartphone integration and advanced safety features such as automatic emergency braking. Moreover, its MHEV technology ensures that drivers can enjoy improved efficiency without sacrificing performance.

The MG MG3 also offers a generous suite of tech features, such as a user-friendly infotainment system, Bluetooth connectivity, and decent safety ratings. Its design ethos focuses more on delivering value-for-money features rather than cutting-edge technology. This positioning makes the MG3 a significant player in the entry-level hatchback market.

MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Final Thoughts: Which One Should You Choose?

In the battle of the Ford Puma vs. the MG MG3, the choice ultimately comes down to personal preference and needs. The Ford Puma is ideal for those seeking an efficient and energetic SUV with advanced technology and ample space. Meanwhile, the MG MG3 appeals strongly to urban drivers in need of a practical and budget-friendly hatchback.

Both vehicles have distinct advantages, and whether you align more with Ford’s innovative approach or MG’s value-driven design, you can’t go wrong with either choice in your journey toward finding the perfect car.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG MG3 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15400 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 9351 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG MG3 manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 has a slightly edge – offering 194 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the MG MG3 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the MG MG3 tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 25 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls clearly stronger with 290 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG MG3 is barely noticeable lighter – 1237 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 79 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers significantly more room – 523 L compared to 293 L. That’s a difference of about 230 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1283 L, which is about 300 L more than the MG MG3.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slight takes the win – 469 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG MG3 proves to be secures victory with a clear margin and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG MG3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £15,400
MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

MG MG3

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 194 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6.1 L

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

MG MG3

5 (1)
rate

The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.

details
Ford Puma
MG MG3
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
MG3 @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
15400 - 21400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 45 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1237 - 1285 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
293 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4113 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1797 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1502 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
983 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
373 - 448 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1490 - 1495 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.