VS

Ford Puma vs MG MG3 comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 15,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MG MG3?

Ford Puma vs MG MG3: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Quick take: Ford Puma VS MG MG3

Ford Puma VS MG MG3 pits a sporty, compact crossover against a budget-oriented hybrid hatchback with surprising punch. The Ford Puma presents itself as the more driver-focused option with clever luggage solutions that feel grown-up for a small SUV. The MG MG3 answers with an aggressively priced hybrid package that delivers brisk city acceleration and an unusually long warranty. This comparison teases out which strengths matter day-to-day rather than which sheet-metal spec is bigger. Expect trade-offs between refinement and value in the paragraphs that follow.

MG3

Driving character and everyday usability

The Ford Puma is noticeably more agile and communicative in corners, so drivers who enjoy steering feel and a playful character will prefer it to the MG MG3. By contrast, the MG MG3 prioritises punchy, low-speed shove from its hybrid system, making it feel quicker off the line in town even if it never quite matches the Puma’s chassis feedback. The Puma’s small-displacement engine and automated gearbox can feel fussy at low speeds, whereas the MG3’s drivetrain can be brisk but louder and less refined under load. In short, choose Puma for engagement and MG3 for lively urban thrust and simple, direct power delivery.

Puma

Comfort and long-distance behaviour

On long runs the Ford Puma settles into a confident, composed stride with seats that support the back, but the cabin sometimes betrays its three-cylinder character at low revs and the rear passengers will notice the squeeze. The MG MG3 is softer over bumps and can feel cosier on broken country roads, yet its noise levels and higher sustained consumption on motorways make long motorway stints less relaxing. Puma’s firmer setup transmits short, sharp imperfections more clearly, while MG3 hides some imperfections at the cost of a louder cabin at speed. The trade-off is clear: Puma favours dynamic composure, MG3 favours short-trip comfort and city-friendly compliance.

MG3

Practicality and everyday usability of luggage space

Practicality is one of the Puma’s strongest cards: the crossover’s clever load area and washable, lower-level storage feel genuinely useful for weekend gear, muddy boots or unexpected cargo. The MG MG3, while sensible for daily groceries and light luggage, has a smaller and less flexible boot with a higher loading lip and a single-piece rear seat that limits cargo arrangements. That difference matters most to buyers who regularly carry bulky items or want simple, low-effort loading — Puma makes those tasks easier. If your life is mostly two-up urban commuting with occasional shopping trips, MG3’s boot will do the job, but it won’t match Puma’s practical cleverness.

Puma

Cabin feel, tech and perceived quality

The Ford Puma’s refreshed interior leans toward modernity with larger screens and a cleaner layout, though some plastics and the removal of physical climate buttons reduce tactile satisfaction for certain buyers. The MG MG3 undercuts on price but shows it in materials and a touchy infotainment system that can feel dated and slow compared with Puma’s snappier software. MG3 does, however, pack a lot of kit for the money and sweetens ownership with a long warranty that offsets perceived finish compromises. So you get a more polished, tech-forward cabin in the Puma and a pragmatic, better-equipped-for-the-price cabin in the MG3.

MG3

Who should buy which car — buyer-fit guidance

If you prioritise driving dynamics, clever load solutions and a slightly more refined long-distance experience, the Ford Puma will suit you better than the MG MG3. Conversely, the MG MG3 is aimed at budget-aware buyers who want hybrid city efficiency, strong off-the-line performance and generous standard equipment with long-term warranty peace of mind. Families that need flexible cargo space and occupants who value cabin tech and composure will lean toward Puma, while first-time buyers, commuters and bargain seekers will find MG3’s proposition hard to beat. Below this editorial we’ll follow up with the technical comparison so you can match these real-world differences to the numbers that matter to your decision.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG MG3 is significantly cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,494 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG MG3 uses 4.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

MG3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers slightly more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the MG MG3 takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers clearly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is barely lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 79 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries barely more – 469 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG MG3 holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £15,400
MG3

MG MG3

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 194 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
details
Ford Puma
MG MG3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG MG3

The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.

details
KV-1-1
Left-Back-30°-1
Front-Row-Space-1
Trunk-3

Reviews MG MG3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Giorgio catacchio
20 Sept 2025, 00:08:28

I've owned the MG3 Hybrid for a year — I travel a lot, never a dull moment; comes fully loaded as standard, incredible acceleration, etc.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
MG MG4
VS
If you're after cheap thrills and nimble city driving, the MG3 is the plucky choice — inexpensive, quirky and perfect for tight car parks. But for real-world practicality, range and a more modern feel, the MG4's stylish hatch and EV tech make it the smarter buy for daily drivers who want a bit of …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
MG MG3
Opel Corsa
VS
Choosing between the MG3 and the Opel Corsa means weighing a budget-friendly, quirky small hatch against a more refined, mainstream rival with stronger dealer support. Which suits you will come down to priorities like build quality, driving refinement, fuel economy and after-sales service.
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
MG MG3

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
373 - 448 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.