Compare performance (194 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (15400 £ vs 18800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Toyota Aygo?
In the arena of compact hatchbacks, two contenders vie for supremacy: the British-bred MG MG3 and the Japanese stalwart, the Toyota Aygo. Both these vehicles offer unique features tailored for urban driving, but how do they compare in terms of performance, innovation, and design? Let's delve deeper into the specifications and features of these two models.
The MG MG3 sets a strong stance with its versatile engine options. This hatchback offers both full hybrid and traditional petrol variants, allowing for greater flexibility and efficiency. With horsepower options ranging from 116 to a peppy 194 HP, the MG3 provides robust performance for city drives, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in a brisk 8 seconds. The curb weight stands at 1285 kg, which complements its acceleration capabilities.
On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo comes with a simpler engine lineup, focusing purely on petrol power. Generating a modest 72 HP, the Aygo is designed for efficiency over power, with its 0 to 100 km/h dash taking 15.5 to 15.6 seconds. Nevertheless, its significantly lighter curb weight of 1015 kg contributes to its nimbleness in urban environments.
In terms of fuel efficiency, both the MG3 and Aygo present commendable figures. The MG3's fuel consumption ranges from 4.4 to 6.1 L/100km, depending on the powertrain chosen, indicating an efficient use of fuel for various driving conditions. The Toyota Aygo, staying true to its economical ethos, records a slightly higher consumption of 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km, still making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious drivers.
Despite their compact designs, both hatchbacks prioritize space and practicality. The MG3 boasts a larger trunk capacity of 293 liters, ideal for urban travelers needing that extra cargo space. It comfortably seats five, making it a friendly choice for small groups or families. The Toyota Aygo, being slightly smaller, offers 231 liters of trunk space and seats four, aligning with its target as a nimble city companion.
The MG MG3 stands out with its mix of traditional and hybrid engines, catering to drivers aiming for both power and eco-friendliness. Its 5-door design, coupled with a sleek body, enhances its appeal in the hatchback segment. The presence of both automatic and manual transmissions offers drivers the flexibility to choose their preferred driving experience.
The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, draws attention with its compact SUV-inspired stance. Despite its smaller engine capacity of 998 cm3, it garners appreciation for its CVT technology, promoting a smooth and effortless driving experience. Its 5-door accessibility remains a practical feature, and though it seats fewer passengers than the MG3, its compact size makes it an excellent choice for urban navigation.
Choosing between the MG MG3 and the Toyota Aygo depends largely on the driver's priorities. If power and the option for hybrid efficiency ring important to a buyer, the MG3 with its array of features might be the go-to. For those prioritizing economical petrol consumption and a lightweight, nimble city vehicle, the Aygo could be the perfect match. Both vehicles blend practicality with modern-day needs, carving their own niche in the bustling hatchback market. Ultimately, the choice lies in individual preferences for power, efficiency, and style.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MG MG3 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15400 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3428 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Aygo manages with 3.70 L and is therefore a bit more efficient than the MG MG3 with 4.40 L. The difference is about 0.70 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 has a convincingly edge – offering 194 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 78 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 9.20 s. That’s about 1.20 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: MG MG3 pulls slightly stronger with 148 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 28 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: MG MG3 offers a bit more seating capacity – 5 vs 4.
In curb weight, Toyota Aygo is a bit lighter – 1090 kg compared to 1237 kg. The difference is around 147 kg.
When it comes to payload, MG MG3 minimal takes the win – 448 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
The MG MG3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15400 - 21400 £
|
Price
18800 - 24300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.70 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
85 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1237 - 1285 kg
|
Curb weight
1090 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1797 mm
|
Width
1740 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Payload
420 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.20 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
120 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1490 - 1495 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1490 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The MG MG3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España