Compare performance (194 HP vs 116 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 18,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Toyota Aygo?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the arena of compact hatchbacks, two contenders vie for supremacy: the British-bred MG MG3 and the Japanese stalwart, the Toyota Aygo. Both these vehicles offer unique features tailored for urban driving, but how do they compare in terms of performance, innovation, and design? Let's delve deeper into the specifications and features of these two models.
The MG MG3 sets a strong stance with its versatile engine options. This hatchback offers both full hybrid and traditional petrol variants, allowing for greater flexibility and efficiency. With horsepower options ranging from 116 to a peppy 194 HP, the MG3 provides robust performance for city drives, accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h in a brisk 8 seconds. The curb weight stands at 1285 kg, which complements its acceleration capabilities.
On the other hand, the Toyota Aygo comes with a simpler engine lineup, focusing purely on petrol power. Generating a modest 72 HP, the Aygo is designed for efficiency over power, with its 0 to 100 km/h dash taking 15.5 to 15.6 seconds. Nevertheless, its significantly lighter curb weight of 1015 kg contributes to its nimbleness in urban environments.
In terms of fuel efficiency, both the MG3 and Aygo present commendable figures. The MG3's fuel consumption ranges from 4.4 to 6.1 L/100km, depending on the powertrain chosen, indicating an efficient use of fuel for various driving conditions. The Toyota Aygo, staying true to its economical ethos, records a slightly higher consumption of 4.8 to 4.9 L/100km, still making it a cost-effective choice for budget-conscious drivers.
Despite their compact designs, both hatchbacks prioritize space and practicality. The MG3 boasts a larger trunk capacity of 293 liters, ideal for urban travelers needing that extra cargo space. It comfortably seats five, making it a friendly choice for small groups or families. The Toyota Aygo, being slightly smaller, offers 231 liters of trunk space and seats four, aligning with its target as a nimble city companion.
The MG MG3 stands out with its mix of traditional and hybrid engines, catering to drivers aiming for both power and eco-friendliness. Its 5-door design, coupled with a sleek body, enhances its appeal in the hatchback segment. The presence of both automatic and manual transmissions offers drivers the flexibility to choose their preferred driving experience.
The Toyota Aygo, meanwhile, draws attention with its compact SUV-inspired stance. Despite its smaller engine capacity of 998 cm3, it garners appreciation for its CVT technology, promoting a smooth and effortless driving experience. Its 5-door accessibility remains a practical feature, and though it seats fewer passengers than the MG3, its compact size makes it an excellent choice for urban navigation.
Choosing between the MG MG3 and the Toyota Aygo depends largely on the driver's priorities. If power and the option for hybrid efficiency ring important to a buyer, the MG3 with its array of features might be the go-to. For those prioritizing economical petrol consumption and a lightweight, nimble city vehicle, the Aygo could be the perfect match. Both vehicles blend practicality with modern-day needs, carving their own niche in the bustling hatchback market. Ultimately, the choice lies in individual preferences for power, efficiency, and style.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG MG3 is noticeably cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Toyota Aygo costs 18,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,428 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Aygo uses 3.7 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the MG MG3 with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers significantly more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 116 HP. That’s roughly 78 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Toyota Aygo takes 9.2 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MG MG3 delivers somewhat more torque with 148 Nm compared to 120 Nm. That’s about 28 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: MG MG3 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota Aygo is somewhat lighter – 1,090 kg compared to 1,237 kg. The difference is around 147 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG MG3 carries barely more – 448 kg compared to 420 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
The MG MG3 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
The Aygo is a cheeky city car that turns congested streets into a playground, with bold styling and sprightly manners that make parking a pleasure rather than a pain. Economical to run and surprisingly well equipped for its size, the Aygo is a smart choice for urban buyers who want personality without a premium price and a car that brings a smile to the daily commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
|
Price
18,800 - 24,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
85 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
|
Curb weight
1,090 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
231 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,740 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Payload
420 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
Power HP
116 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
120 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
Power kW
85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,490 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España