Compare performance (237 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (57,500 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Marco Polo or Nissan Townstar?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Nissan Townstar is clearly cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,780 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Townstar uses 6.7 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers significantly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 107 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes Marco Polo is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Nissan Townstar takes 12.6 s. That’s about 5.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes Marco Polo is moderately faster – reaching 220 km/h, while the Nissan Townstar tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 37 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Marco Polo delivers significantly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 255 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan Townstar offers more seats – 7 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Townstar is clearly lighter – 1,509 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 941 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Townstar offers slightly more boot space – 775 L compared to 670 L. That’s a difference of about 105 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers visibly more capacity – up to 4,630 L, about 1,580 L more than the Nissan Townstar.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries barely more – 650 kg compared to 641 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.
The Nissan Townstar has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.
details
The Nissan Townstar is a pragmatic city companion that blends clever packaging with a calm, easygoing drive, making it ideal for urban errands and small-business hauls. It won't win any style contests, but its tidy interior, sensible features and no-nonsense character make it a genuinely useful buy for people who value practicality over pizzazz.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
|
Price
25,700 - 37,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
265 - 281 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
194 - 218 g/km
|
co2
0 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
4
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
|
Curb weight
1,509 - 2,041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
670 L
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 775 L
|
|
Length
5,140 mm
|
Length
4,488 - 4,911 mm
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,859 - 1,860 mm
|
|
Height
1,975 mm
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,800 - 3,050 L
|
|
Payload
555 - 650 kg
|
Payload
506 - 641 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 - 13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
|
Max Speed
135 - 183 km/h
|
|
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Nissan
|