Compare performance (237 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (28,800 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Transporter or Ford Transit Transporter?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes Vito Transporter is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,800 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 38,527 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers moderately more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 72 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers a bit more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 32 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Transporter delivers somewhat more torque with 500 Nm compared to 430 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Mercedes Vito Transporter holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Ford
|