Compare performance (237 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (28800 £ vs 31600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Transporter or Toyota Proace Transporter?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes Vito Transporter has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28800 £ , while the Toyota Proace Transporter costs 31600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2853 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota Proace Transporter manages with 6.40 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.80 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes Vito Transporter: with 21.20 kWh per 100 km, it’s somewhat more efficient than the Toyota Proace Transporter with 23.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs evident better – achieving up to 474 km, about 125 km more than the Toyota Proace Transporter.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Transporter has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 237 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Toyota Proace Transporter performs somewhat better – reaching 170 km/h, while the Mercedes Vito Transporter tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes Vito Transporter pulls evident stronger with 500 Nm compared to 370 Nm. That’s about 130 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Toyota Proace Transporter offers slightly more seating capacity – 6 vs 5.
In curb weight, Toyota Proace Transporter is to a small extent lighter – 1656 kg compared to 1916 kg. The difference is around 260 kg.
Maximum load volume is the same – both hold up to 6600 L.
When it comes to payload, Toyota Proace Transporter clearly perceptible takes the win – 1323 kg compared to 884 kg. That’s a difference of about 439 kg.
The Mercedes Vito Transporter comes out ahead with a more balanced overall result in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
detailsThe Toyota Proace Transporter is a no-nonsense work van that pairs Toyota’s dependable reputation with smart practicality, so you can load, drive and finish the job without unnecessary drama. It won’t win design awards, but with a comfortable cab, sensible feature set and a focus on getting things done, it quietly keeps fleets and small businesses smiling.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28800 - 51600 £
|
Price
31600 - 51000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 - 6.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.8 - 23.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
Electric Range
221 - 349 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
69 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1916 - 2518 kg
|
Curb weight
1656 - 2100 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4895 - 5390 mm
|
Length
4980 - 5330 mm
|
|
Width
1928 mm
|
Width
1920 mm
|
|
Height
1910 - 1945 mm
|
Height
1895 - 1935 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 6600 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3200 - 6600 L
|
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Payload
955 - 1323 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
120 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.1 - 13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 370 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
88 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1950 - 1999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1499 - 2184 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Toyota
|
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is available as Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.