VS

MG Cyberster vs Nissan Townstar Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (510 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (55,700 £ vs 29,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Cyberster or Nissan Townstar Compact Van?

MG Cyberster vs Nissan Townstar Compact Van: Key differences

MG Cyberster

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably more electric range
details

Nissan Townstar Compact Van

  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Cyberster

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Townstar Compact Van is substantially cheaper – starting at 29,500 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,248 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MG Cyberster is clearly more efficient: consuming 16.7 kWh/100km compared to 20.9 kWh/100km for the Nissan Townstar Compact Van. That’s a difference of about 4.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the MG Cyberster offers considerably more range – reaching up to 507 km, about 244 km more than the Nissan Townstar Compact Van.

Townstar Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers substantially more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 380 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers significantly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 480 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan Townstar Compact Van offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Townstar Compact Van is substantially lighter – 1,399 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 561 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Townstar Compact Van carries substantially more – 775 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 625 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Cyberster is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,700
Cyberster

MG Cyberster

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 510 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 443 - 507 km
MG Cyberster
Nissan Townstar Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details

Nissan Townstar Compact Van

The Nissan Townstar is a smart, no-nonsense compact van that makes city running and tight deliveries feel almost effortless thanks to tidy packaging and clever storage. It keeps things sensible on the wallet and the road, offering a comfortable driving position and useful tech without flashy frills — the kind of workhorse you'll actually enjoy parking at the kerb.

details
MG Cyberster
Nissan Townstar Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Price
29,500 - 37,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
20.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Electric Range
263 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 - 155 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Roadster
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
2
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Curb weight
1,399 - 1,908 kg
Trunk capacity
200 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,913 mm
Width
1,860 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
150 kg
Payload
571 - 775 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
Brand
MG
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.