VS

MG Cyberster vs VW Caddy comparison

Compare performance (510 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (55,700 £ vs 27,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Cyberster or VW Caddy?

MG Cyberster vs VW Caddy: Key differences

MG Cyberster

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

VW Caddy

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Cyberster

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

VW Caddy is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,946 £.

As for electric range, the MG Cyberster offers clearly more range – reaching up to 507 km, about 386 km more than the VW Caddy.

Caddy

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers significantly more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 360 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the VW Caddy takes 11.4 s. That’s about 8.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers clearly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 405 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: VW Caddy offers more seats – 7 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, VW Caddy is noticeably lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 385 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Caddy carries significantly more – 710 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 560 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Cyberster holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £55,700
Cyberster

MG Cyberster

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 340 - 510 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 443 - 507 km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Touran
VW Caddy
VS
If you want a car-like family MPV with a polished interior, refined ride and tidy handling, the VW Touran feels like the grown-up choice for daily driving and longer trips. But if practicality rules—max cargo, sliding doors and a no-nonsense, van-like toughness—the VW Caddy is the smarter pick for …
Ford Tourneo Connect
VW Caddy
VS
Choosing between the Ford Tourneo Connect and the VW Caddy comes down to priorities — do you want maximum flexible space and smart family-focused practicality, or a more refined, solidly built compact MPV? The Tourneo Connect shines for clever packaging and value, while the Caddy offers a more …
MG Cyberster
VW Caddy

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG Cyberster

The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.

details
serpimg_kJiKA7

Reviews MG Cyberster

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW Caddy

The VW Caddy is the Swiss-army knife of compact vans — practical, surprisingly refined, and ready to swap a weekend adventure for a grocery run without breaking a sweat. It’s user-friendly, comfortable enough for daily driving, and sensible for buyers who want utility with a dash of style and no drama.

details
Small-27321-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27320-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27309-ThenewCaddyLife
Small-27313-ThenewCaddyLife

Reviews VW Caddy

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Jakob Blans
12 May 2026, 16:22:17

A really lovely car with space for a wheelchair and much more, which we've had for almost 14 years and driven over 200,000 km with. Now the gearbox has failed and we'd like to buy a new one.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Driving Fun / Performance
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot 5008
VW Caddy
VS
Comparing the Peugeot 5008 and the VW Caddy helps you choose between a family-focused SUV and a utilitarian compact van. The 5008 delivers roomy seating, a refined ride and SUV styling for family comfort, while the VW Caddy prioritizes cargo versatility, easy loading and practical durability for …
Peugeot Rifter
VW Caddy
VS
The Peugeot Rifter and the VW Caddy are practical, spacious compact MPVs/compact vans aimed at families and small-business users; this comparison looks at space, comfort, efficiency and value to help you decide which fits your needs. The Rifter leans toward SUV-like styling and rugged practicality, …
Toyota Proace City
VW Caddy
VS
The Toyota Proace City is the no-nonsense workhorse: cavernous load space, clever folding seats and Toyota’s bulletproof reputation, while the Volkswagen Caddy feels more grown-up behind the wheel with tighter steering and a nicer cabin. If budget and reliability are your priority grab the Proace …
Ford Transit Connect
VW Caddy
VS
The Ford Transit Connect and the VW Caddy are two of the most popular compact vans for small businesses and urban operators, offering a practical mix of cargo space, fuel economy and maneuverability. Choose the Transit Connect if you want slightly more load flexibility and car-like driving …
Citroen Berlingo
VW Caddy
VS
The Citroën Berlingo and the VW Caddy are two of Europe's most popular compact vans, prized by families and small businesses for their practical space, versatile seating and low running costs. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Berlingo’s clever, budget-friendly practicality or …
Dacia Jogger
VW Caddy
VS
The Dacia Jogger and the VW Caddy offer practical, spacious transport for families and small businesses, but they take very different approaches: the Jogger is a budget-focused, flexible seven-seater while the Caddy is a van-derived compact MPV with stronger build quality and load-carrying ability. …
MG Cyberster
Denza Z9GT
VS
MG Cyberster and Denza Z9GT go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the MG Cyberster or the Denza …
Ford Tourneo Courier
VW Caddy
VS
The Ford Tourneo Courier and the VW Caddy are two compact people-carriers/van-derived MPVs that aim at buyers needing practicality and versatility—one is tuned for city-friendly agility, the other for roominess and refinement. I’ll compare their space, engines, comfort and running costs to help you …
MG Cyberster
VW Caddy

Costs and Consumption
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
Price
27,800 - 45,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
Electric Range
116 - 121 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
10 - 165 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Roadster
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
2
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,998 kg
Trunk capacity
200 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
Width
1,913 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
1,819 - 1,860 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,556 - 3,700 L
Payload
150 kg
Payload
501 - 710 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 14 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
173 - 186 km/h
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
Brand
MG
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the MG Cyberster have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.