Compare performance (194 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (15,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG3 or Nissan Juke?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The automotive market is filled with choices, and two contenders that stand out are the MG MG3 and the Nissan Juke. Both vehicles cater to different niches, yet they attract buyers looking for style, performance, and functionality. This article delves into a detailed comparison, analyzing technical specifications and innovations that set these two models apart.
The MG MG3 is a stylish hatchback designed with urban mobility in mind. Its dimensions measure 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1502 mm in height, making it compact yet spacious enough for a small family. In contrast, the Nissan Juke is an SUV that spans 4210 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and 1593 mm in height, offering a more commanding presence on the road.
While the MG3 leans towards a sporty aesthetic, the Juke boasts a distinctive design with its bold lines and unique headlights, giving it a rugged appeal suited for adventurous spirits.
Under the hood, the MG MG3 is equipped with a 1.5-liter full hybrid engine that produces an impressive 194 HP and 143 kW of power. It features an automatic gearbox and a front-wheel-drive setup, propelling the MG3 from 0 to 100 km/h in just 8 seconds. Its fuel consumption is exceptionally low, averaging 4.4 L/100 km, and it emits only 100 g/km of CO2, placing it in a commendable CO2 efficiency class of C.
On the other hand, the Nissan Juke offers a variety of engine options, ranging from a 999 cm3 to a 1598 cm3 engine, producing between 114 HP and 143 HP. Depending on the selected variant, it can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in a range of 10.1 to 11.8 seconds. While the Juke’s fuel consumption varies, it can go as low as 4.7 L/100 km with the most efficient model, although other versions can consume up to 6 L/100 km. The Nissan’s CO2 emissions range from 107 g/km to 137 g/km, which varies based on the chosen engine type.
Both the MG3 and Juke cater well to passenger comfort and practicality. The MG MG3 is designed to accommodate up to five passengers comfortably. Its trunk capacity stands at a respectable 293 liters, ideal for urban living and weekend getaways.
The Nissan Juke, being an SUV, offers a larger trunk capacity, ranging from 354 liters to 422 liters, depending on the variation. Both cars also feature five-door designs, making access easy for all occupants. The added height of the Juke translates to a more spacious feel in the cabin, giving it an edge in terms of passenger comfort.
Innovation is key in today's automotive landscape. The MG MG3 includes modern technologies like an advanced infotainment system, ensuring connectivity and entertainment are at the forefront of the driving experience. The automatic transmission adds a layer of convenience in urban environments, particularly during heavy traffic.
Conversely, the Nissan Juke embraces cutting-edge features with options for both manual and automatic gearboxes, including a dual-clutch system for smoother transitions. It comes equipped with a range of safety features, including advanced driver-assistance systems that enhance both safety and driving dynamics. Furthermore, the Juke’s full hybrid option provides greater efficiency, catering to eco-conscious consumers.
Choosing between the MG MG3 and the Nissan Juke ultimately comes down to personal preference and needs. The MG3 shines with its hybrid efficiency and agile performance, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. In contrast, the Nissan Juke wins over those seeking a more versatile SUV experience, complete with additional cargo space and innovative safety features. Both vehicles epitomize modern design and technology, offering compelling choices in today’s competitive automotive market.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG MG3 is visibly cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Nissan Juke costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,965 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG MG3 uses 4.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 offers visibly more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 51 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Juke delivers markedly more torque with 200 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 52 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG MG3 is very slightly lighter – 1,237 kg compared to 1,274 kg. The difference is around 37 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG MG3 carries barely more – 448 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 21 kg.
The MG MG3 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG3 is a cheeky city hatch that pairs bold, youthful styling with sprightly handling for drivers who want personality on a budget. Its cabin is bright and cleverly packaged, offering sensible space and a fun-to-drive character that turns mundane commutes into something a bit more enjoyable.
details
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
15,400 - 21,400 £
|
Price
21,400 - 31,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,237 - 1,285 kg
|
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
373 - 448 kg
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,490 - 1,495 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España