In a head-to-head comparison, the MG3 proves to be a more budget-friendly option with its affordable pricing and decent interior space, making it an ideal choice for young drivers or city dwellers. On the other hand, the Nissan Juke stands out with its distinctive styling and sporty performance, offering a more engaging driving experience and a higher level of technology features. While both cars cater to different preferences, the decision ultimately hinges on whether you prioritize value or flair in your next vehicle.
The automotive market is filled with choices, and two contenders that stand out are the MG MG3 and the Nissan Juke. Both vehicles cater to different niches, yet they attract buyers looking for style, performance, and functionality. This article delves into a detailed comparison, analyzing technical specifications and innovations that set these two models apart.
The MG MG3 is a stylish hatchback designed with urban mobility in mind. Its dimensions measure 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1502 mm in height, making it compact yet spacious enough for a small family. In contrast, the Nissan Juke is an SUV that spans 4210 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and 1593 mm in height, offering a more commanding presence on the road.
While the MG3 leans towards a sporty aesthetic, the Juke boasts a distinctive design with its bold lines and unique headlights, giving it a rugged appeal suited for adventurous spirits.
Under the hood, the MG MG3 is equipped with a 1.5-liter full hybrid engine that produces an impressive 194 HP and 143 kW of power. It features an automatic gearbox and a front-wheel-drive setup, propelling the MG3 from 0 to 100 km/h in just 8 seconds. Its fuel consumption is exceptionally low, averaging 4.4 L/100 km, and it emits only 100 g/km of CO2, placing it in a commendable CO2 efficiency class of C.
On the other hand, the Nissan Juke offers a variety of engine options, ranging from a 999 cm3 to a 1598 cm3 engine, producing between 114 HP and 143 HP. Depending on the selected variant, it can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in a range of 10.1 to 11.8 seconds. While the Juke’s fuel consumption varies, it can go as low as 4.7 L/100 km with the most efficient model, although other versions can consume up to 6 L/100 km. The Nissan’s CO2 emissions range from 107 g/km to 137 g/km, which varies based on the chosen engine type.
Both the MG3 and Juke cater well to passenger comfort and practicality. The MG MG3 is designed to accommodate up to five passengers comfortably. Its trunk capacity stands at a respectable 293 liters, ideal for urban living and weekend getaways.
The Nissan Juke, being an SUV, offers a larger trunk capacity, ranging from 354 liters to 422 liters, depending on the variation. Both cars also feature five-door designs, making access easy for all occupants. The added height of the Juke translates to a more spacious feel in the cabin, giving it an edge in terms of passenger comfort.
Innovation is key in today's automotive landscape. The MG MG3 includes modern technologies like an advanced infotainment system, ensuring connectivity and entertainment are at the forefront of the driving experience. The automatic transmission adds a layer of convenience in urban environments, particularly during heavy traffic.
Conversely, the Nissan Juke embraces cutting-edge features with options for both manual and automatic gearboxes, including a dual-clutch system for smoother transitions. It comes equipped with a range of safety features, including advanced driver-assistance systems that enhance both safety and driving dynamics. Furthermore, the Juke’s full hybrid option provides greater efficiency, catering to eco-conscious consumers.
Choosing between the MG MG3 and the Nissan Juke ultimately comes down to personal preference and needs. The MG3 shines with its hybrid efficiency and agile performance, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. In contrast, the Nissan Juke wins over those seeking a more versatile SUV experience, complete with additional cargo space and innovative safety features. Both vehicles epitomize modern design and technology, offering compelling choices in today’s competitive automotive market.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 15400 - 20600
£
|
Price
about 21200 - 29900
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
0.6
kWh
|
co2
100 - 137
g/km
|
co2
107 - 137
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
36
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
46
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1285
kg
|
Curb weight
1274 - 1405
kg
|
Trunk capacity
293
L
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422
L
|
Length
4113
mm
|
Length
4210
mm
|
Width
1797
mm
|
Width
1800
mm
|
Height
1502
mm
|
Height
1593
mm
|
Payload
448
kg
|
Payload
405 - 427
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Schaltgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
116 - 194
HP
|
Power HP
114 - 143
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8
s
|
Max Speed
170
km/h
|
Max Speed
166 - 180
km/h
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
200
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
85 - 143
kW
|
Power kW
84 - 105
kW
|
Engine capacity
1490
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598
cm3
|
Top speed
170
km/h
|
Top speed
166 - 180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Nissan
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.