Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
MG MG4 Urban vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (160 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MG4 Urban or Ford Puma?
MG MG4 Urban vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
MG4 Urban
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG MG4 Urban is a bit cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,494 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is slightly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 15.3 kWh/100km for the MG MG4 Urban. That’s a difference of about 2.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 1 km more than the MG MG4 Urban.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers barely more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 160 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the MG MG4 Urban takes 9.5 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers a bit more torque with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is moderately lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,460 kg. The difference is around 144 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 479 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
MG MG4 Urban
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MG MG4 Urban
The MG4 Urban is an affordable, well‑packaged electric hatchback that balances everyday practicality with a surprisingly roomy cabin and confident handling. It’s a smart choice if you want an easy-to-live-with EV that focuses on value and usable range rather than luxury frills.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
MG MG4 Urban
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 27,000 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.3 - 15.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
325 - 416 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,460 - 1,520 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
470 - 479 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,842 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 160 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
110 - 118 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.