Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi ASX vs Volvo V60 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (158 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (20600 £ vs 41600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Volvo V60?
ASX
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi ASX has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 41600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21086 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo V60 manages with 2.40 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Mitsubishi ASX with 4.40 L. The difference is about 2 L per 100 km.
V60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 has a decisively edge – offering 455 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 297 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.50 s. That’s about 3.90 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo V60 pulls decisively stronger with 709 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 439 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
ASX
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is evident lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1734 kg. The difference is around 438 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo V60 offers hardly perceptible more room – 519 L compared to 484 L. That’s a difference of about 35 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs a bit better – up to 1596 L, which is about 165 L more than the Volvo V60.
When it comes to payload, Volvo V60 a bit takes the win – 506 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo V60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mitsubishi ASX
Volvo V60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £41,600
Volvo V60
Mitsubishi ASX
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
Volvo V60
5 (1 Reviews)
The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.
details
Mitsubishi ASX
Volvo V60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20600 - 32500 £
|
Price
41600 - 64200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 6.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
92 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
99 - 135 g/km
|
co2
54 - 140 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
|
Curb weight
1734 - 2064 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
4239 mm
|
Length
4778 mm
|
|
Width
1797 mm
|
Width
1850 mm
|
|
Height
1575 mm
|
Height
1432 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1431 L
|
|
Payload
397 - 449 kg
|
Payload
466 - 506 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.