VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Captur comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Renault Captur?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Captur: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

ASX

Overview: Mitsubishi ASX and Renault Captur in direct comparison

Mitsubishi ASX and Renault Captur share the same small‑SUV territory but steer buyers toward different priorities, so this page looks at Mitsubishi ASX VS Renault Captur through everyday use rather than specs. The ASX presents itself as the quietly practical, slightly more conservative choice—with flexible luggage solutions and a lengthy warranty that soothes ownership worries. The Captur, by contrast, trades a bit of raw space for sharper digital tech, a punchier cabin impression and generally lower entry prices. That split—practicality and peace of mind versus infotainment, urban agility and value—is the lens to keep in mind when you read the rest of this comparison.

Captur

Cabin feel and controls: tactile calm versus digital show

Step into the Renault Captur and the big, Google‑driven screen and crisp graphics establish a modern, tech‑forward vibe; the Captur’s cockpit feels contemporary and connected. By contrast the Mitsubishi ASX prefers physical knobs and a more restrained layout, which makes routine tasks feel familiar and less distracting on day‑to‑day drives. That difference shows up in use: Captur’s fast OpenR system and voice assistant make navigation and media straightforward, but the lack of dedicated knobs can be fiddly while moving. ASX’s simpler screen and tactile climate controls feel less flashy but more predictable for buyers who value low‑stress ergonomics.

ASX

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour: noise, seats and highway manners

On the motorway the Renault Captur tends to come across as the quieter and more settled companion, especially in hybrid form where long stretches become surprisingly composed. The Mitsubishi ASX, meanwhile, is exceptionally civil around town thanks to frequent electric driving, but it can be more vocally present when you ask for sustained overtakes. Ride character diverges by setup: Captur can feel a touch firmer over sharp joints, while ASX leans toward a forgiving seat and suspension balance that suits relaxed journeys. For long trips, pick Captur for a lower cabin noise floor and ASX if you prefer cushioned seats and a more forgiving rear bench.

Captur

Practicality and luggage: usable volume versus modular cleverness

If you measure usefulness by how much you can actually load, the Mitsubishi ASX has the edge with a more usable boot and options like a double floor that make organising luggage easier in daily life. The Renault Captur answers with flexible tricks: a sliding rear bench and clever storage that let you tune passenger space versus cargo, although its loading sill and deeper floor sometimes make bulky items harder to handle. Electrified versions of either car change that picture—some hybrid variants reduce cargo depth—so the real‑world advantage depends on the exact powertrain you pick. In short, ASX favours straightforward capacity and utility, Captur favours modularity and clever packaging.

ASX

City friendliness and daily usability: nimble tech against calm pragmatism

In urban use the Renault Captur feels nimbler to steer and benefits from long electric glide phases that make stop‑start traffic almost effortless, plus its infotainment and assistants smooth parking and route guidance. The Mitsubishi ASX is equally city‑oriented in a different way: its hybrid systems promote serene low‑speed driving and its layout reduces cognitive load, though its parking sensors and warnings can sometimes be overzealous. Visibility is a mixed bag—Captur’s rear sightlines are more restricted despite good camera systems, while ASX gives better outward confidence from the driver's seat. Cost instincts diverge too: Captur often arrives cheaper up front, while ASX’s conservative consumption and extended warranty appeal to owners thinking beyond the sticker price.

Captur

Buyer fit: who should test‑drive which car next?

Choose the Mitsubishi ASX if you prioritise usable luggage space, straightforward controls and the reassurance of a longer factory warranty—it’s made for buyers who want quiet daily commute efficiency and practical family flexibility. Opt for the Renault Captur if modern infotainment, urban agility and a sharper initial purchase price matter more to you; Captur will attract tech‑minded commuters and small households who value connectivity. Small families that routinely pack strollers and suitcases will likely prefer the ASX’s real‑world cargo handling, whereas couples and city commuters will enjoy the Captur’s cockpit and lighter price. Read the technical comparison below to see how measured luggage, weight, torque and consumption figures support these everyday differences and help you decide which trade‑offs match your priorities.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
Captur and Symbioz showcase two very different Renault directions: Captur is a practical compact crossover focused on everyday comfort, economy and usability, while Symbioz is a forward‑looking concept exploring electric power, autonomous driving and living‑space ideas. This short comparison will …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Captur is marginally cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mitsubishi ASX costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 35 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Renault Captur with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Captur

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

Both models deliver identical power – 158 HP each.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 8.9 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers only slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is only slightly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,323 kg. The difference is around 27 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers moderately more boot space – 484 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries only slightly more – 453 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 8 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.3 - 6 L/100km
details
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
Jaca
15 Apr 2026, 15:55:53

A super-sporty compact crossover — raised ground clearance, drives light and enjoyable, very pleasant, well-insulated interior. Perfect size of car for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.

details
r210470p
r210480p
r210476p
r210485p

Reviews Renault Captur

4.8 (7 Reviews)
rate
Lüsi
15 May 2026, 16:11:37

More affordable, high-level infotainment and better quality — good value for money.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Pet
4 Feb 2026, 11:01:12

The car was a very pleasant surprise. Very comfortable and enjoyable. The 1.3 TCe 158 hp engine is brilliant.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
1 Feb 2026, 13:55:20

A 2025 mild‑hybrid, 160 hp.
Really nice little car. Mostly doing 200 km trips. Driving isn’t tiring. I trusted the driver‑assistance systems and… I wasn’t disappointed. The adaptive cruise control is brilliant, though I’d trust it about 90%. Overtaking punch is a plus. I recommend it with a clear conscience. Ah, just those 18" wheels 🤦. Obviously fuel consumption is higher because it’s an automatic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Sandero
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Dacia Sandero and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you prioritise affordable, no-nonsense practicality or a more refined, crossover-style package with extra equipment. The Sandero delivers exceptional value and low running costs, while the Captur offers more comfort, …
Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
The Renault Captur and SEAT Arona are two of Europe’s most popular compact crossovers, each offering a city-friendly footprint with raised driving position and SUV styling. This short comparison focuses on practicality, driving character, running costs and feature value to help you pick the one …
Citroen C3
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you want a compact, comfort-focused hatch with quirky styling or a slightly larger, more versatile crossover with a higher driving position. I’ll compare practicality, fuel economy, driving feel and value so you can pick …
Renault Captur
Renault Mégane
VS
Small, raised and city-savvy, the Renault Captur is the compact crossover for shoppers who want higher seating, flexible space and an easygoing ride; the Renault Mégane, by contrast, is a sharper hatch that rewards drivers with crisper handling and a more planted feel. If your life is school runs …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Renault Captur
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Renault Captur and Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, practicality and efficient powertrains. The Captur leans on bold design and flexible interior space, while the Yaris Cross prioritizes hybrid efficiency, Toyota’s …
Opel Mokka
Renault Captur
VS
The Opel Mokka prowls the urban jungle with bold styling and surprisingly sharp handling that makes it feel like a grown-up compact SUV, while the Renault Captur plays the sensible diplomat with a softer ride, clever cabin tricks and a friendlier fuel bill. Pick the Mokka if you want punchy driver …
Citroen C3 Aircross
Renault Captur
VS
The Citroën C3 Aircross and Renault Captur are two compact crossover SUVs that blend city-friendly size with SUV practicality, each offering clever packaging, efficient engines and a comfortable ride. Choose the C3 Aircross if you prioritise quirky styling, outstanding interior flexibility and a …
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
Price
21,400 - 28,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 137 g/km
co2
100 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
447 - 453 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
Is the Mitsubishi ASX offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi ASX is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.