Compare performance (158 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (20600 £ vs 21100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Renault Captur?
When it comes to the competitive world of SUVs, both Mitsubishi and Renault are powerful players that provide unique features and innovative technologies. In this article, we delve into a head-to-head comparison of their latest models, focusing on technical aspects, innovations, and on-road performance.
The 2024 models from both Mitsubishi and Renault reflect a dedication to performance with diverse engine options. Mitsubishi offers various choices, including petrol and petrol Mild Hybrid engines, with outputs ranging from 91 HP to 158 HP. In contrast, Renault showcases its versatility with full hybrid systems and LPG options alongside traditional petrol engines, providing a range of horsepower output from 91 HP to 158 HP as well.
Fuel efficiency is a cornerstone of modern vehicle design. Mitsubishi's range sees consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100km, while Renault matches this with its most economical options coming in at similar levels. This indicates a commitment to sustainability while maintaining performance.
Both manufacturers employ a Front-Wheel Drive configuration, facilitating control and stability on a variety of terrains. Mitsubishi offers several transmission options, including a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic, complementing its sportier variants. Similarly, Renault provides a well-rounded lineup with automatic and manual gearbox choices, enhancing driver engagement and comfort.
The Mitsubishi models display impressive acceleration, with times ranging from 8.5 seconds to 14 seconds for 0-100 km/h, depending on the engine variant. On the other hand, Renault’s acceleration times are slightly more varied, with the top performers reaching 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.5 seconds, cementing Renault’s reputation for sporty dynamics.
In terms of top speed, Mitsubishi peaks at 180 km/h, while Renault offers a similar range, with some models reaching up to 173 km/h. Both manufacturers balance speed with practicality, ensuring that drivers can enjoy spirited performance while maintaining safety and fuel efficiency.
Dimensions play a crucial role in the perception of space and comfort. Both Mitsubishi and Renault boast similar dimensions; both models feature a length of 4239 mm, width of 1797 mm, and height of 1575 mm. The interior space is optimized for comfort with arrangements for five passengers in both brands.
When it comes to trunk capacity, Mitsubishi takes the lead with 484 liters, while Renault offers a commendable 422 liters, making both options suitable for families and individuals alike. The balance of passenger comfort and cargo space makes these SUVs excellent choices for dynamic lifestyles.
The automotive market is increasingly driven by innovation. Mitsubishi has integrated new technologies into its vehicles, focusing on driver assistance systems, enhanced infotainment, and connectivity features. These advancements improve safety and convenience on the road.
Renault has also embraced cutting-edge technology, particularly in its hybrid models. With features like energy regeneration systems and advanced navigation software, Renault ensures that its vehicles are future-proof and environmentally conscious. With both brands prioritizing innovation, consumers can expect a host of modern amenities and safety technologies.
The choice between Mitsubishi and Renault ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific driving needs. Each brand offers robust SUV options that excel in performance, efficiency, and innovation. Whether it’s Mitsubishi's solid reputation for reliability or Renault’s flair for modern engineering, both models present a compelling case for prospective SUV buyers in 2024.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mitsubishi ASX has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £ , while the Renault Captur costs 21100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 566 £.
Both cars consume an average of 4.40 L per 100 km – no difference here.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
Both models deliver identical power – 158 HP each.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.50 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls slight stronger with 270 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is barely noticeable lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1323 kg. The difference is around 27 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers to a small extent more room – 484 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs a bit better – up to 1596 L, which is about 233 L more than the Renault Captur.
When it comes to payload, Renault Captur barely noticeable takes the win – 453 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.
The Mitsubishi ASX has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.
details
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
20600 - 32500 £
|
Price
21100 - 28400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
99 - 135 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
|
Curb weight
1323 - 1441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
4239 mm
|
Length
4239 mm
|
|
Width
1797 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
1575 mm
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1363 L
|
|
Payload
397 - 449 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Renault
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España