@ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Captur – Which one offers the better deal?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Renault Captur?

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Mitsubishi vs. Renault: A Comprehensive SUV Comparison

When it comes to the competitive world of SUVs, both Mitsubishi and Renault are powerful players that provide unique features and innovative technologies. In this article, we delve into a head-to-head comparison of their latest models, focusing on technical aspects, innovations, and on-road performance.

Captur @ Renault Group Media

Engine Performance and Efficiency

The 2024 models from both Mitsubishi and Renault reflect a dedication to performance with diverse engine options. Mitsubishi offers various choices, including petrol and petrol Mild Hybrid engines, with outputs ranging from 91 HP to 158 HP. In contrast, Renault showcases its versatility with full hybrid systems and LPG options alongside traditional petrol engines, providing a range of horsepower output from 91 HP to 158 HP as well.

Fuel efficiency is a cornerstone of modern vehicle design. Mitsubishi's range sees consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100km, while Renault matches this with its most economical options coming in at similar levels. This indicates a commitment to sustainability while maintaining performance.

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Transmission and Drive Type

Both manufacturers employ a Front-Wheel Drive configuration, facilitating control and stability on a variety of terrains. Mitsubishi offers several transmission options, including a manual gearbox and a dual-clutch automatic, complementing its sportier variants. Similarly, Renault provides a well-rounded lineup with automatic and manual gearbox choices, enhancing driver engagement and comfort.

Captur @ Renault Group Media

Acceleration and Speed

The Mitsubishi models display impressive acceleration, with times ranging from 8.5 seconds to 14 seconds for 0-100 km/h, depending on the engine variant. On the other hand, Renault’s acceleration times are slightly more varied, with the top performers reaching 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.5 seconds, cementing Renault’s reputation for sporty dynamics.

In terms of top speed, Mitsubishi peaks at 180 km/h, while Renault offers a similar range, with some models reaching up to 173 km/h. Both manufacturers balance speed with practicality, ensuring that drivers can enjoy spirited performance while maintaining safety and fuel efficiency.

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Dimensions and Comfort

Dimensions play a crucial role in the perception of space and comfort. Both Mitsubishi and Renault boast similar dimensions; both models feature a length of 4239 mm, width of 1797 mm, and height of 1575 mm. The interior space is optimized for comfort with arrangements for five passengers in both brands.

When it comes to trunk capacity, Mitsubishi takes the lead with 484 liters, while Renault offers a commendable 422 liters, making both options suitable for families and individuals alike. The balance of passenger comfort and cargo space makes these SUVs excellent choices for dynamic lifestyles.

Captur @ Renault Group Media

Innovative Features

The automotive market is increasingly driven by innovation. Mitsubishi has integrated new technologies into its vehicles, focusing on driver assistance systems, enhanced infotainment, and connectivity features. These advancements improve safety and convenience on the road.

Renault has also embraced cutting-edge technology, particularly in its hybrid models. With features like energy regeneration systems and advanced navigation software, Renault ensures that its vehicles are future-proof and environmentally conscious. With both brands prioritizing innovation, consumers can expect a host of modern amenities and safety technologies.

ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Conclusion: Making the Choice

The choice between Mitsubishi and Renault ultimately comes down to personal preference and specific driving needs. Each brand offers robust SUV options that excel in performance, efficiency, and innovation. Whether it’s Mitsubishi's solid reputation for reliability or Renault’s flair for modern engineering, both models present a compelling case for prospective SUV buyers in 2024.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Captur @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi ASX has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 20600 £, while the Renault Captur costs 21100 £. That’s a price difference of around 566 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the Renault Captur with 4.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX has a barely noticeable edge – offering 158 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.50 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 180 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mitsubishi ASX pulls slight stronger with 270 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is barely noticeable lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1323 kg. The difference is around 27 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers to a small extent more room – 484 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 62 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi ASX performs a bit better – up to 1596 L, which is about 233 L more than the Renault Captur.

When it comes to payload, Renault Captur barely noticeable takes the win – 453 kg compared to 449 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi ASX proves to be leads convincingly overall and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi ASX is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £20,600
ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 91 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX presents itself as a compact crossover that combines practicality with style. Its sleek design and versatile interior make it an appealing choice for both urban and rural settings. With a focus on providing a comfortable driving experience, the ASX also offers a range of modern features that enhance connectivity and safety.

details

Renault Captur

5 (1)
rate

The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.

details
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur
ASX @ Mitsubishi Motors Corporation
Captur @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
20600 - 32500 £
Price
21100 - 28300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 135 g/km
co2
102 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
Fuel tank capacity
48 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Curb weight
1323 - 1514 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Length
4239 mm
Length
4239 mm
Width
1797 mm
Width
1797 mm
Height
1575 mm
Height
1575 mm
Max trunk capacity
1458 - 1596 L
Max trunk capacity
1276 - 1363 L
Payload
397 - 449 kg
Payload
376 - 453 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 158 HP
Power HP
115 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.5 - 14 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
168 - 180 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
160 - 270 Nm
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
67 - 116 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.