Compare performance (138 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 21,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Kia Niro or Renault Captur?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of urban SUVs, the Kia Niro and Renault Captur have made significant strides as practical and stylish choices for city driving. As environmental concerns grow, these models deliver an optimal blend of efficiency, innovation, and versatility. Let's break down the details to see how these two contenders stack up against each other.
The Kia Niro presents a sleek design with its longer body measuring 4420mm, a width of 1825mm, and a height of 1545mm. This aligns it with traditional SUV styling while maintaining manageable proportions for urban driving. In contrast, the Renault Captur offers a slightly more compact build with dimensions of 4239mm in length, 1797mm in width, and a taller height of 1575mm, which can appeal to those navigating tighter city spaces.
The Kia Niro comes in both Full Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid variants, with power outputs ranging from 129 to 171 HP. The maximum torque offered is 265 Nm, and it provides a decent acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in 10.4 to 11.3 seconds, depending on the variant. The Renault Captur sports a more diverse range, from Full Hybrid to LPG options, and outputs between 91 and 158 HP. It offers slightly more powerful torque figures reaching up to 270 Nm and a faster acceleration time of 8.5 to 14.3 seconds.
Both vehicles are designed to minimize environmental impact. The Kia Niro boasts impressive fuel efficiency with consumption as low as 4.4 L/100km for its hybrids and CO2 emissions between 19 to 23 g/km in its Plugin Hybrid variant. Its electric range extends from 59 to 65 km, thanks to its decent battery capacity reaching up to 11.1 kWh. On the other hand, the Renault Captur maintains competitiveness with its efficiency class ranging from C to D, consuming between 4.7 and 7.8 L/100km depending on engine choice and carbureted CO2 emissions around 106 to 139 g/km.
Both SUVs excel in passenger comfort with seating for five and ample tech features. The Kia Niro offers a slightly larger trunk capacity, with 451L, making it convenient for families and shopping trips. The Renault Captur provides a roomy interior despite its smaller trunk with a capacity of 422L. The choice between automatic and manual transmissions in the Captur offers flexibility for driving preferences.
The Kia Niro and Renault Captur each bring unique strengths to the table. For eco-conscious drivers looking for electric range and efficiency without sacrificing style, the Kia Niro provides a compelling package. Meanwhile, the Renault Captur, with its variety of engine options and agile urban dimensions, appeals to those seeking a dynamic and versatile ride. As both models progress into 2024, choosing between them ultimately depends on your lifestyle needs and personal priorities on the road.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Renault Captur is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,100 £ , while the Kia Niro costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,006 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Kia Niro with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur offers moderately more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 138 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Captur is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Kia Niro takes 11.1 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
Both models offer the same torque – 265 Nm.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is a bit lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 1,474 kg. The difference is around 151 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Kia Niro carries barely more – 466 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 13 kg.
The Renault Captur is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Kia Niro blends clever packaging and modern styling into a compact crossover that’s refreshingly sensible for daily life. It’s comfortable, economical and packed with user‑friendly tech, so if you want a fuss‑free family car with a touch of green credibility, the Niro is worth a test drive.
details
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 33,800 £
|
Price
21,100 - 28,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 111 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,474 kg
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,239 mm
|
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,363 L
|
|
Payload
466 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
138 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 11.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
265 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
102 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,580 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Kia
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España