VS

Mitsubishi Colt vs VW Golf Variant comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 333 HP), boot space and price (18,200 £ vs 26,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or VW Golf Variant?

Mitsubishi Colt vs VW Golf Variant: Key differences

Mitsubishi Colt

  • significantly cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • somewhat lighter

VW Golf Variant

  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Colt

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Colt is significantly cheaper – starting at 18,200 £ , while the VW Golf Variant costs 26,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,976 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Colt uses 4.2 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the VW Golf Variant with 4.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Golf Variant

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Golf Variant offers considerably more power – delivering 333 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Golf Variant is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.8 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.3 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the VW Golf Variant is markedly faster – reaching 250 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Colt tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 76 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Golf Variant delivers clearly more torque with 420 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is somewhat lighter – 1,189 kg compared to 1,366 kg. The difference is around 177 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW Golf Variant offers noticeably more boot space – 611 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 220 L.

For maximum load capacity, the VW Golf Variant offers markedly more capacity – up to 1,642 L, about 573 L more than the Mitsubishi Colt.

When it comes to payload, the VW Golf Variant carries visibly more – 547 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 162 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Golf Variant is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £26,100
Golf Variant

VW Golf Variant

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 333 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.3 - 8.2 L/100km
Mitsubishi Colt
VW Golf Variant

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Colt

The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.

details

VW Golf Variant

The Golf Estate packs Volkswagen's familiar poise into a practical, grown-up estate that quietly makes everyday life easier without shouting for attention. It's clever, comfortable and roomy enough for weekend kit or family chaos, offering smart packaging and refined manners that make it a sensible and surprisingly stylish choice for buyers who need space but don't want a van.

details
Mitsubishi Colt
VW Golf Variant

Costs and Consumption

Price
18,200 - 25,000 £
Price
26,100 - 48,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
96 - 119 g/km
co2
114 - 185 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,189 - 1,380 kg
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,621 kg
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Trunk capacity
611 L
Length
4,053 mm
Length
4,631 - 4,651 mm
Width
1,798 mm
Width
1,789 mm
Height
1,439 mm
Height
1,462 - 1,487 mm
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1,069 L
Max trunk capacity
1,624 - 1,642 L
Payload
381 - 385 kg
Payload
489 - 547 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
Power HP
116 - 333 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 - 10.5 s
Max Speed
174 km/h
Max Speed
203 - 250 km/h
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
Torque
220 - 420 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
Power kW
85 - 245 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, G, F, C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
VW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.