Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs MINI Aceman comparison
Compare performance (218 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or MINI Aceman?
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs MINI Aceman: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Eclipse Cross
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MINI Aceman is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,134 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers clearly more range – reaching up to 627 km, about 272 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers somewhat more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 7.9 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers somewhat more torque with 350 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Eclipse Cross
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is a bit lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 1,922 kg. The difference is around 202 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers significantly more boot space – 545 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 245 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries clearly more – 530 kg compared to 413 kg. That’s a difference of about 117 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
MINI Aceman
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.
details
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
MINI Aceman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
615 - 627 km
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,922 - 1,950 kg
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,908 mm
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
385 - 413 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
218 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
160 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
MINI
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.