VS

MINI Aceman vs VW ID.3 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (258 HP vs 326 HP), boot space and price (25500 £ vs 28600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or VW ID.3?

Aceman

MINI Aceman vs. VW ID.3: A Battle of Electric Ingenuity

As the automotive industry shifts toward electrification, two innovative models stand out in the compact electric vehicle market: the MINI Aceman and the Volkswagen ID.3. Both vehicles promise unique features, impressive performance, and eco-friendly credentials, making them prime contenders for those looking to make a sustainable choice without compromising on style or functionality. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two electric cars, emphasizing technical specifications and innovative features.

ID.3

Design and Dimensions

The MINI Aceman, styled as a compact SUV, embodies the quintessential sporty MINI aesthetics with contemporary twists. Measuring 4079 mm in length and 1754 mm in width, it presents a compact yet dynamic silhouette suitable for urban environments. In contrast, the Volkswagen ID.3 takes the form of a hatchback, longer at 4264 mm and wider at 1809 mm, projecting a more spacious feel while maintaining a sleek exterior. The height of the Aceman at 1514 mm is slightly lower than the ID.3's 1564 mm, contributing to a more grounded look.

Aceman

Powertrains and Performance

When it comes to performance, both vehicles feature advanced electric powertrains. The MINI Aceman offers a choice of power outputs, ranging from 184 HP to a thrilling 258 HP, with torque figures between 290 Nm and 350 Nm across its variants. The ID.3 provides an even wider power spectrum, with outputs from 170 HP up to a robust 326 HP, and torque levels that peak at an impressive 545 Nm for enhanced acceleration.

Acceleration is another key performance metric. The Aceman can sprint from 0 to 100 km/h in a range of 7.9 seconds to 6.4 seconds, depending on the variant. In comparison, the ID.3 boasts slightly faster acceleration times, with its most powerful version hitting 100 km/h in just 5.7 seconds.

ID.3

Battery and Electric Range

Battery capacity is crucial for determining electric range, and both models respond well to consumer demands. The Aceman is equipped with a battery capacity ranging from 38.5 kWh to 49.2 kWh, allowing for a respectable electric range between 309 km and 405 km, depending on the specific battery configuration. On the other hand, the ID.3 showcases a more extensive battery repertoire, with options from 52 kWh to 79 kWh, enabling ranges from 383 km to a staggering 604 km — a significant advantage for long-distance excursions.

Aceman

Efficiency and Charging

Both the MINI Aceman and VW ID.3 shine in terms of efficiency. The Aceman demonstrates consumption rates from 14.0 kWh/100km to 16.0 kWh/100km, while the ID.3 is slightly less efficient, ranging from 14.5 kWh/100km to 15.8 kWh/100km. These rates highlight both models' commitment to lower energy consumption, critical for modern EV owners.

ID.3

Interior Space and Comfort

Interior dimensions and practicality play pivotal roles in choosing an electric vehicle. The Aceman offers a trunk capacity of 300 liters, making it a solid choice for everyday errands. The ID.3, meanwhile, bests its rival with a more spacious trunk capacity of 385 liters, ideal for those needing additional cargo space for family outings or adventure gear. Both cars comfortably seat five passengers, making them practical for small families or groups.

Innovative Features

In the realm of technology and features, the MINI Aceman focuses on providing a dynamic driving experience blended with modern amenities. It includes a minimalist interior showcasing a digital cockpit that enhances driver engagement. VW's ID.3, on the other hand, leverages the brand's ID. software to provide excellent connectivity features, augmented reality displays, and a user-friendly infotainment system that brightens the driving experience.

Conclusion: The Electrifying Choice

The decision between the MINI Aceman and VW ID.3 ultimately hinges on individual preferences and lifestyle. The Aceman is ideal for those who desire a sporty SUV aesthetic with agile performance, while the ID.3 caters to consumers prioritizing range and space. As electric vehicles continue to evolve, both models are set to capture the hearts of eco-conscious drivers and technology enthusiasts alike.

MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

VW ID.3

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MINI Aceman has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £ , while the VW ID.3 costs 28600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3111 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the VW ID.3 with 14.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.50 kWh.

As for electric range, the VW ID.3 performs distinct better – achieving up to 605 km, about 200 km more than the MINI Aceman.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.3 has a noticeable edge – offering 326 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.3 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.70 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.

There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 200 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW ID.3 pulls evident stronger with 545 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 195 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MINI Aceman is barely noticeable lighter – 1720 kg compared to 1787 kg. The difference is around 67 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW ID.3 offers distinct more room – 385 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 85 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW ID.3 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1267 L, which is about 262 L more than the MINI Aceman.

When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman slightly takes the win – 530 kg compared to 473 kg. That’s a difference of about 57 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW ID.3 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

MINI Aceman
VW ID.3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £28,600
ID.3

VW ID.3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 170 - 326 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.5 - 15.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 383 - 605 km
details

MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

VW ID.3

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

The VW ID.3 is a crisply styled electric hatch that masks serious practicality behind a friendly, modern face, making city runs and longer trips pleasantly fuss free. For buyers seeking a sensible, well-equipped EV that doesn't take itself too seriously, the ID.3 strikes a neat balance of comfort, tech and everyday usability with a cheeky smile.

details
DB2020AU01067_medium
DB2019AU01515_medium
DB2019AU01516_medium
DB2020AU01118_medium
DB2020AU01119_medium
DB2020AU01097_medium
DB2020AU01100_medium

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Reviews VW ID.3

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
Mr C Blagdon
14 Jan 2026, 12:07:54

Great all rounder, surprisingly spacious cabin. Rapid and refined. Not quiet enough space in the boot for a bike, could use more ground clearance.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Top Car Comparisons

Kia EV3
VW ID.3
VS
Pitted against each other, the Kia EV3 feels like the roomy, no-nonsense upstart — taller, more practical and geared toward families who want SUV style without the fuel bill — while the VW ID.3 is the sharper, more polished hatch that rewards drivers who prefer nimble handling and mature software. …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
MINI Aceman
VW ID.3

Costs and Consumption
Price
25500 - 36200 £
Price
28600 - 49300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
14.5 - 15.8 kWh
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
Electric Range
383 - 605 km
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
Battery Capacity
52 - 79 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
Curb weight
1787 - 1993 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
385 L
Length
4079 mm
Length
4264 mm
Width
1754 mm
Width
1809 mm
Height
1514 mm
Height
1564 mm
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
Max trunk capacity
1267 L
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
437 - 473 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
170 - 326 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 8.2 s
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
310 - 545 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
125 - 240 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MINI
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

VW ID.3
Skoda Elroq
VS
Line them up and the electric VW ID.3 comes off as the clever, zippy high-tech hatch you want for city runs and engaging driving, while the Skoda Elroq plays the straight man—roomy, practical and relentlessly sensible. Pick the ID.3 for zero‑emission fun and gadgetry; go for the Elroq if everyday …
Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
The Renault 5 arrives as a cheeky retro reboot — compact, full of personality and perfect for nimble city living — while the VW ID.3 plays the sensible electric family car, offering more range, room and that reassuringly German calm. If you want fun and style for town runs choose the Renault 5; if …
MINI Aceman
Renault R5
VS
In the battle of compact electric vehicles, the MINI Aceman and the Renault R5 showcase their unique takes on modern driving. The Aceman boasts a playful yet sophisticated design, paired with MINI's signature handling and technology, while the Renault R5 revives a classic aesthetic infused with …
VW ID.3
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW ID.3 and VW T-Roc present two distinct approaches to modern driving, each tailored to diverse lifestyles. The ID.3, as Volkswagen’s pioneering electric vehicle, offers a futuristic design with zero-emissions motoring, perfect for the environmentally conscious urban driver. In contrast, the …
VW ID.3
VW ID.4
VS
In the electric vehicle arena, the VW ID.3 and ID.4 stand out as two compelling options from Volkswagen, catering to different consumer needs. While the ID.3 excels with its compact design and agile handling, making it ideal for urban environments, the ID.4 offers enhanced space and versatility, …
MINI Countryman
VW ID.3
VS
In the battle between the MINI Countryman and the VW ID.3, drivers can expect a clash of style and innovation. The Countryman offers a distinctive blend of retro charm and practicality, making it a favorite for those who appreciate iconic design. Meanwhile, the ID.3 stands out with its fully …
Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact, sharply tuned EV with Scandinavian flair — sprightly, surprisingly premium and built to put a grin on urban commutes. The VW ID.3, by contrast, plays the sensible family card with more interior space, comfort and range options, so pick the EX30 for driving fun …
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
In the latest showdown between the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman, drivers can expect a fresh take on the classic MINI experience. The Aceman offers a more compact design with an emphasis on electric performance, while the Countryman remains a versatile favorite with its spacious interior and …
Is the MINI Aceman offered with different drivetrains?

The MINI Aceman is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.