In the battle of compact electric vehicles, the MINI Aceman and the Renault R5 showcase their unique takes on modern driving. The Aceman boasts a playful yet sophisticated design, paired with MINI's signature handling and technology, while the Renault R5 revives a classic aesthetic infused with futuristic features. Both models aim to capture the hearts of urban drivers, but their distinct personalities will appeal to different tastes in style and performance.
In the evolving landscape of electric vehicles, two contenders stand out with their stylish designs and impressive specifications—the MINI Aceman and the Renault R5. Both embody the spirit of modernity while prioritizing sustainability. However, as they compete for the attention of eco-conscious consumers, their technical specifications and innovations leave enthusiasts eager for a deeper comparison.
The MINI Aceman adopts a sporty SUV design, boasting a robust presence complemented by its modern aesthetics. It measures 4079 mm in length, 1754 mm in width, and stands at a height of 1514 mm, creating a versatile and bold profile suited for both city driving and adventurous outings.
In contrast, the Renault R5 embodies the hatchback design, harking back to its iconic predecessors while embracing contemporary styling cues. Smaller yet agile, the R5 measures 3922 mm in length, 1744 mm in width, and reaches a height of 1498 mm, making it an ideal city car that’s easy to maneuver in tight spaces.
Under the hood, the MINI Aceman offers an electrifying choice of power outputs, ranging from 184 HP to a commanding 258 HP, providing drivers with thrilling acceleration. It achieves a 0-100 km/h time ranging from 6.4 to 7.9 seconds, depending on the variant, making it remarkably sprightly for an SUV.
The Renault R5, while slightly less powerful, delivers respectable performance with power outputs from 95 HP to 150 HP. The acceleration ranges from 8 to 9 seconds for the R5, ensuring an exhilarating drive, particularly within urban settings.
Range anxiety is a common concern among electric vehicle owners, but both models excel in efficiency. The MINI Aceman boasts an impressive electric range of up to 405 km, thanks to its dual battery options of 38.5 kWh and 49.2 kWh. With a consumption rate as low as 14.0 kWh/100km, the Aceman is designed for the modern commuter.
The Renault R5 holds its ground with a range of up to 405 km using a 40 kWh battery. However, its consumption rate is slightly higher at 14.8 kWh/100km. While both vehicles prioritize efficiency, the Aceman's enhanced range could be a deciding factor for consumers looking for longer excursions without frequent recharging.
Despite being an SUV, the MINI Aceman offers a manageable trunk capacity of 300 liters, suitable for day-to-day shopping or weekend getaways. With seating for five, it ensures ample room for passengers without compromising comfort.
The Renault R5, while having a slightly larger trunk capacity of 326 liters, is designed primarily for urban mobility, making it practical for city dwellers who value space efficiency. Both vehicles can comfortably accommodate five individuals, showcasing versatility in their design philosophies.
Modern drivers expect cutting-edge technology, and both the MINI Aceman and Renault R5 come equipped with innovative features. The Aceman offers an intuitive infotainment system with a focus on user experience, seamlessly integrating connectivity options and advanced driver-assistance systems.
The Renault R5 incorporates similar tech advancements, boasting modern connectivity features that appeal to tech-savvy users. It focuses on creating a user-friendly environment that enhances the driving experience, solidifying its status as a forward-thinking hatchback.
In the battle between the MINI Aceman and the Renault R5, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths and cater to different segments of the electric vehicle market. The Aceman stands out with its robust SUV design, higher performance metrics, and superior electric range. Conversely, the R5 provides an iconic hatchback experience, making it ideal for urban environments and those looking for a compact, efficient ride.
Ultimately, the choice between the two will come down to personal preferences in style, performance, and intended use. As the automotive world shifts towards electric mobility, both models represent significant steps forward in eco-friendly transportation.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 29900 - 41000
£
|
Price
about 21300 - 29500
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8
kWh
|
Electric Range
309 - 405
km
|
Electric Range
300 - 405
km
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
40
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
3
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825
kg
|
Curb weight
1447 - 1524
kg
|
Trunk capacity
300
L
|
Trunk capacity
326
L
|
Length
4079
mm
|
Length
3922
mm
|
Width
1754
mm
|
Width
1744
mm
|
Height
1514
mm
|
Height
1498
mm
|
Payload
450 - 455
kg
|
Payload
396 - 418
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
184 - 258
HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 200
km/h
|
Max Speed
150
km/h
|
Torque
290 - 350
Nm
|
Torque
215 - 245
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
135 - 190
kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
160 - 200
km/h
|
Top speed
150
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Renault
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.