VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Fiat Panda comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 70 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 14,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Fiat Panda?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Fiat Panda: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • slightly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

Fiat Panda

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Space Star

Panda vs. Space Star: Clash of Compact Titans

Urban driving enthusiasts, rejoice! Today, we dive into a detailed comparison between two popular and efficient hatchbacks gracing the narrow streets and challenging parking spots of modern cities. Both the Fiat Panda and Mitsubishi Space Star have made names for themselves in the segment of compact hatchbacks. But what really sets these cars apart, and how do they stack up against each other? Let’s find out.

Panda

The Heart of the Beast: Engine and Performance

The Fiat Panda is powered by a 999 cm3 petrol Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle (MHEV) engine, delivering a modest yet competent 70 horsepower (HP) and 92 Nm of torque. With a manual gearbox, this front-wheel-drive machine accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 13.9 to 14.7 seconds, and can reach speeds up to 164 km/h.

In contrast, the Mitsubishi Space Star comes with a slightly larger 1193 cm3 petrol engine, producing 71 HP and 102 Nm of torque. It offers both manual and automatic CVT transmission options, with a 0-100 km/h acceleration time ranging from 14.1 to 15.8 seconds and a maximum speed of up to 167 km/h. This slight edge in power can make a significant difference in performance, especially for those who prefer automatic transmissions for a smoother drive experience.

Space Star

Fuel Efficiency: Saving on the Go

When it comes to fuel efficiency, both cars offer economically conscious solutions. The Fiat Panda consumes between 5 and 5.1 liters per 100 kilometers, with CO2 emissions ranging between 113 and 116 g/km. It also boasts a larger fuel tank capacity of 38 liters, potentially allowing for fewer stops at the gas station.

The Mitsubishi Space Star, with its fuel consumption varying from 4.9 to 5.5 liters per 100 kilometers, presents itself as a strong contender in terms of economy. Its CO2 emissions fall within the range of 112 and 125 g/km, slightly beating the Panda in greener emissions. Although its fuel tank is two liters smaller at 35 liters, its superior efficiency could offset the need for frequent refueling.

Panda

Space and Comfort: Interior and Cargo

Inside, both hatchbacks cater to small families or city adventurers with seating capacities ranging from four to five passengers. The Fiat Panda offers a trunk capacity of 225 liters, modest for light urban transportation but potentially limiting for larger cargo needs.

The Mitsubishi Space Star, slightly more accommodating, provides up to 235 liters of trunk space, granting a bit more room for those grocery runs or weekend getaways. Both models feature a practical five-door layout, ensuring easy access for passengers and parcels alike.

Space Star

Dimensions and Maneuverability

The Panda stretches between 3653 and 3705 mm in length, with a width and height of up to 1662 mm and 1657 mm, respectively. These dimensions afford it a compact nature, perfect for city navigation and tight parking situations.

Meanwhile, the Space Star is slightly larger at 3845 mm in length, 1665 mm in width, and a more petite height of 1505 mm. While it offers a broader frame, it maintains agile handling in urban settings, courtesy of its smart design and engineering.

Panda

The Verdict: Which Is Right for You?

Choosing between the Fiat Panda and Mitsubishi Space Star will largely depend on your preferences and needs. The Panda shines with its hybrid technology, strong efficiency, and classic Italian appeal. On the other hand, the Space Star impresses with its slightly better power output, versatility in transmission options, and a touch more cargo room.

Budget-conscious city dwellers and young families will find much to love in both models, but ultimately, the decision rests on your priorities: tech-savvy efficiency versus practical power and space. Either way, both hatchbacks are set to handle the urban jungle with ease and distinction.

Frequently compared as well

Fiat Panda
Fiat Pandina
VS
Comparing the Fiat Panda and the Pandina helps you decide whether you want a practical, feature-rich city car or a pared-back, economical runabout. The Panda offers more space, comfort and equipment for everyday use, while the Pandina prioritises low running costs, simplicity and compact charm.
Fiat 500
Fiat Panda
VS
The Fiat 500 is a cheeky, retro-styled city charmer that wraps bright personality and nimble handling into a compact package ideal for urban life. By contrast, the Fiat Panda trades glamour for practicality — roomier, tougher on rough roads and far more usable for families or weekend escapes, so …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is visibly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Fiat Panda costs 14,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,486 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Fiat Panda with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

Panda

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers only slightly more power – delivering 71 HP compared to 70 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Fiat Panda is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 13.9 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Mitsubishi Space Star is very slightly faster – reaching 167 km/h, while the Fiat Panda tops out at 164 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mitsubishi Space Star delivers very slightly more torque with 102 Nm compared to 92 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is slightly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,055 kg. The difference is around 115 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers very slightly more boot space – 235 L compared to 225 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi Space Star offers only slightly more capacity – up to 912 L, about 42 L more than the Fiat Panda.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Space Star carries very slightly more – 400 kg compared to 365 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £11,600
Space Star

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 71 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
details
Mitsubishi Space Star
Fiat Panda

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Fiat Panda

The Panda is a charming, no-nonsense city companion that mixes cheerful Italian flair with genuinely useful practicality, making tight streets and daily errands feel less of a chore. Its honest simplicity, clever packaging and a dash of cheeky character make it a smart, low-stress buy for people who prefer sensible perks over showroom flash.

details
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_333
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_157
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_304
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_049

Reviews Fiat Panda

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Fiat Panda
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Fiat Panda often comes down to whether you want a comfort-focused, stylish city hatch or a no-nonsense, practical small car. I’ll highlight the key differences in interior space, fuel economy, driving feel and running costs so you can decide which suits your …
Fiat Panda
Kia Picanto
VS
The Fiat Panda and Kia Picanto are two of Europe’s most sensible city cars, offering affordable running costs and easy maneuverability for urban life. The Panda emphasizes practicality and interior space with a rugged, no-nonsense character, while the Picanto delivers sharper handling, more modern …
Fiat Panda
Peugeot 208
VS
The Fiat Panda and Peugeot 208 are two popular small hatchbacks that approach city driving very differently: the Panda emphasizes practicality, simplicity and surprising interior space, while the 208 prioritises style, refinement and modern tech. Choose the Panda for low running costs, rugged …
Fiat Panda
Toyota Aygo
VS
The Fiat Panda and Toyota Aygo are both popular city cars but take different approaches—Panda prioritises practicality, interior space and versatility, while the Aygo focuses on compact size, efficiency and easy urban manoeuvrability. This comparison will help you decide whether you need the …
Fiat Panda
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Fiat Panda and the Fiat Grande Panda comes down to whether you want maximum city agility or extra space and comfort. The Panda is geared for tight urban driving and low running costs, while the Grande Panda offers a roomier cabin and more practicality for longer trips or small …
Fiat Panda
Renault Twingo
VS
Choosing between the Fiat Panda and the Renault Twingo is basically a choice between roomy, practical versatility and compact, city-focused agility. I’ll walk you through how they stack up on space, comfort, driving feel and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Kia Picanto
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
Kia Picanto and Mitsubishi Space Star go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Kia Picanto or …
Fiat Panda
Opel Corsa
VS
In the competitive world of compact cars, the Fiat Panda and Opel Corsa stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. While the Panda is celebrated for its quirky design and impressive versatility, the Corsa offers a more refined driving experience with superior tech features. …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Fiat Panda

Costs and Consumption
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
14,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
113 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
38 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
1,055 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
225 L
Length
3,845 mm
Length
3,635 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,643 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
1,551 mm
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
870 L
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
365 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
70 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.9 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
164 km/h
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
92 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
51 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Fiat
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.