Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Space Star vs Lamborghini Urus comparison
Compare performance (71 HP vs 800 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 199,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Lamborghini Urus?
Mitsubishi Space Star vs Lamborghini Urus: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Space Star
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Lamborghini Urus costs 199,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 187,800 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Lamborghini Urus uses 2.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.
Urus
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Lamborghini Urus offers substantially more power – delivering 800 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 729 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lamborghini Urus is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.3 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 10.8 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Lamborghini Urus is substantially faster – reaching 312 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 145 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Lamborghini Urus delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 848 Nm more.
Space Star
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,150 kg. The difference is around 1,210 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Lamborghini Urus offers substantially more boot space – 616 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 381 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Lamborghini Urus offers clearly more capacity – up to 1,596 L, about 684 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.
When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Space Star carries moderately more – 400 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 50 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £11,600
Mitsubishi Space Star
Mitsubishi Space Star
Lamborghini Urus
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mitsubishi Space Star
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.
details
Lamborghini Urus
The Lamborghini Urus wears its raging bull badge with SUV practicality, serving supercar drama in a package you can live with every day. It hustles through corners like a sports car while hauling weekend gear with unapologetic style, perfect for buyers who crave attention and usable performance.
details
Mitsubishi Space Star
Lamborghini Urus
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
|
Price
199,400 - 257,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.1 - 14.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
112 - 125 g/km
|
co2
51 - 320 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
85 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
|
Curb weight
2,150 - 2,405 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
|
Trunk capacity
454 - 616 L
|
|
Length
3,845 mm
|
Length
5,112 - 5,137 mm
|
|
Width
1,665 mm
|
Width
2,018 - 2,026 mm
|
|
Height
1,505 mm
|
Height
1,618 - 1,638 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,596 L
|
|
Payload
359 - 400 kg
|
Payload
100 - 350 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
71 HP
|
Power HP
666 - 800 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.3 - 3.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
|
Max Speed
305 - 312 km/h
|
|
Torque
102 Nm
|
Torque
850 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
8
|
|
Power kW
52 kW
|
Power kW
490 - 588 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
|
Engine capacity
3,996 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Lamborghini
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.