VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Volvo V60 comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Volvo V60?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Volvo V60: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 39,772 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V60 uses 2 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.9 L/100km.

V60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers clearly more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 279 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 8.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V60 delivers significantly more torque with 589 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 487 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,734 kg. The difference is around 794 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo V60 offers considerably more boot space – 519 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 284 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo V60 carries clearly more – 506 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 106 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo V60 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,400
V60

Volvo V60

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 197 - 350 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2 - 6.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 99 km
Mitsubishi Space Star
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details

Volvo V60

The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.

details
Mitsubishi Space Star
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption

Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
99 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
45 - 141 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
460 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.