VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs VW Golf comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 325 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 28,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or VW Golf?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs VW Golf: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

VW Golf

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the VW Golf costs 28,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,633 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Golf uses 1.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 3.8 L/100km.

Golf

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the VW Golf offers significantly more power – delivering 325 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 254 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Golf is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 8.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Golf delivers substantially more torque with 420 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 318 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,307 kg. The difference is around 367 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW Golf offers clearly more boot space – 381 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 146 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW Golf carries markedly more – 508 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 108 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Golf stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,300
Golf

VW Golf

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 325 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.1 - 7.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 131 - 143 km
details

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
VW Golf
VW ID.Polo
VS
Choosing between the VW Golf and the VW ID. Polo means deciding between a proven, practical compact hatchback and Volkswagen’s fresh electric-minded city model. I’ll walk you through the real-world differences in driving feel, space, running costs and tech so you can pick the one that suits your …
Mitsubishi Space Star
VW Golf

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

VW Golf

The Golf is a quietly accomplished compact that blends practicality, refinement and approachable driving manners into a very usable everyday package. It’s well built, comfortable and versatile, making it a smart choice whether you want sensible family transport or an enjoyable commuter.

details
DB2019AU02117_medium
DB2019AU02116_medium
DB2019AU02120_medium
DB2019AU02082_medium
DB2019AU02081_medium
DB2019AU02087_medium
DB2019AU02105_medium

Reviews VW Golf

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW Taigo
VS
The VW Golf remains the benchmark compact hatchback with precise handling, sensible packaging and a grown-up interior that rewards drivers who value refinement and everyday usability; the Taigo, by contrast, trades some practicality for SUV looks and a higher ride, offering bolder styling, slightly …
Skoda Fabia
VW Golf
VS
Two icons of the small-car world go head-to-head: the Skoda Fabia, the bargain-minded all-rounder, takes on the VW Golf, the class benchmark for driving refinement and pedigree. We’ll compare space, tech, engines and running costs to tell buyers which one delivers the best balance of value, comfort …
VW Golf
VW Polo
VS
The Volkswagen Golf and Volkswagen Polo are two of the brand’s best-known hatchbacks, with the Golf leaning toward greater space, refinement and tech while the Polo focuses on affordability, city-friendly size and economy. This comparison will show where the Golf justifies its extra cost and where …
SEAT Ibiza
VW Golf
VS
The SEAT Ibiza and the VW Golf are two staple compact hatchbacks — the Ibiza leans toward youthful styling, sharp handling and strong value, while the Golf delivers a more refined cabin, broader model range and higher-tech options. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise fun and …
Audi Q2
VW Golf
VS
The Audi Q2 trades the Golf’s down-to-earth practicality for a dash of city-cool style and a slightly raised driving position, so you’ll arrive looking sharper — but with a bit less rear-seat space and often a higher price. For buyers who value sensible packaging, ride comfort and everyday …
VW Golf
VW T-Cross
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Cross comes down to whether you want a traditional hatchback with sharper driving dynamics or a compact crossover that prioritizes space, practicality and a higher seating position. The Golf rewards with more engaging handling and a refined interior, while …
VW Golf
Leapmotor B05
VS
VW Golf and Leapmotor B05 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the VW Golf or the Leapmotor B05 …
Lexus LBX
VW Golf
VS
In the world of luxury compact vehicles, the Lexus LBX stands out with its refined design and premium materials, offering a plush interior that feels a cut above the rest. On the other hand, the VW Golf, known for its sporty yet practical appeal, brings robust performance and a track record of …
Mitsubishi Space Star
VW Golf

Costs and Consumption
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
28,300 - 46,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.1 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
131 - 143 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
25 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
1,307 - 1,662 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
273 - 381 L
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,789 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
438 - 508 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
116 - 325 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 10.2 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
220 - 420 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
85 - 239 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, F, B
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.